A comparative study of the effectiveness of search result presentation on the Web

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3936 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 302-313

  Joho, Hideo ^a   Jose, Joemon M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUERY LANGUAGES; USER INTERFACES; WEBSITES;

ADAPTIVE MODELS; SENTENCE BASED SUMMARISATION TECHNIQUE; TEXTUAL DOCUMENTS;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 33745845088     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11735106_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Jansen, B.J., et al., Real Life Information Retrieval: A Study of User Queries on the Web. ACM SIGIR Forum: A Publication of the Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval, 1998. 32(1): p. 5-17.
2. Ingwersen, P. and K. Järvelin, The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. The Information Retrieval Series. Vol. 18. 2005: Springer.
3. Belkin, N.J., R.N. Oddy, and H.M. Brooks, ASK for information retrieval: Part I. Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 1982. 38(2): p. 61-71.
4. Belew, R., Finding Out About- Search Engine Technology from a Cognitive Perspective. 2000: Cambrdige University Press.
5. Hearst, M.A. and J.O. Pederson. Re-examining the Cluster Hypothesis: Scatter/Gather on Retrieval Results. in Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1996. Zurich, Switzerland: ACM.
6. Taylor, R.S., Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 1968. 29: p. 178-194.
7. White, R., J.M. Jose, and I. Ruthven, Using Top-Ranking Sentences to Facilitate Effective Information Access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005. 56(10): p. 1113-1125.
8. Chen, H. and S. Dumais. Bringing Order to the Web: Automatically Categorizing Search Results. in Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human factors in computing systems. 2000. The Hague Netherlands: ACM.
9. White, R., J.M. Jose, and I. Ruthven, A task oriented-study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching. Information Processing and Management, 2003. 9(5): p. 707-733.
10. Dziadosz, S. and R. Chandrasekar. Do thumbnail previews help users make better relevance decisions about web search results? in Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 2002. Tampere, Finland: ACM.
11. Tombros, A. and M. Sanderson. Advantages of query-biased summaries in information retrieval, in Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1998. Melbourne, Australia: ACM.
12. Borlund, P., Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 2000. 56(1): p. 71-90.
13. Tombros, A., I. Ruthven, and J.M. Jose, How Users Assess Web Pages for Information Seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005. 56(4): p. 327-344.
14. Woodruff, A., et al., A comparison of the use of text summaries, plain thumbnails, and enhanced thumbnails for Web search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002. 53(2): p. 172 - 185.