Comparison of the Luus-Jaakola optimization and Gauss-Newton methods for parameter estimation in ordinary differential equation models

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 45, Issue 13, 2006, Pages 4716-4725

  Linga, Praveen ^a   Al Saifi, Nayef ^a   Englezos, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CONVERGENCE PROBLEMS; GAUSS-NEWTON (GN) METHOD; LUUS AND JAAKOLA (LJ) METHOD; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION MODELS;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 33745841519     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie060051q     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Englezos, P.; Kalogerakis, N. Applied Parameter Estimation for Chemical Engineers; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001.
2. Edgar, T. F.; Himmelblau, D. M. Optimization of Chemical Processes; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1988.
3. Gill, P. E.; Murray, W.; Wright, M. H. Practical Optimization; Academic Press: London, 1981.
4. Sargent, R. W. H. In A Review of Optimization Methods for Nonlinear Problems; Squires, R. G., Reklaitis, G. V. E., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1980; pp 37-52.
5. Bard, Y. Comparison of Gradient Methods for the Solution of Nonlinear Parameter Estimation Problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1970, 7, 157-186.
6. Bishop, C. M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition; Oxford University Press: London, 1995.
7. Holland, J. H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, 1975.
8. Kirkpatrick, S.; Gelatt, C. D.; Vecchi, M. P. Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science 1983, 220 (4598), 671-680.
9. Luus, R.; Jaakola, T. H. I. Optimization by Direct Search and Systematic Reduction of Size of Search Region. AICHE J. 1973, 19 (4), 760-766.
10. Luus, R. Determination of the region sizes for LJ optimization procedure. Hung. J. Ind. Chem. 1998, 26 (4), 281-286.
11. Luus, R. Parameter estimation of Lotka-Volterra problem by direct search optimization. Hung. J. Ind. Chem. 1998, 26 (4), 287-292.
12. Luus, R., Application of direct search optimization for parameter estimation. In Scientific computing in chemical engineering II. Simulation, image processing, optimization and control; Keil, F., Mackens, W., Voss, H., Werther, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 1999; pp 346-353.
13. Luus, R.; Hartig, F.; Keil, F. J. Optimal Drug Scheduling of Cancer-Chemotherapy by Direct Search Optimization. Hung. J. Ind. Chem. 1995, 23 (1), 55-58.
14. Lee, Y. P.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Luus, R. Phase and chemical equilibrium calculations by direct search optimization. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1999, 23 (9), 1183-1191.
15. Englezos, P.; Kalogerakis, N.; Trebble, M. A.; Bishnoi, P. R. Estimation of Multiple Binary Interaction Parameters in Equations of State Using Vie Data - Application to the Trebble Bishnoi Equation of State. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 1990, 58 (1-2), 117-132.
16. Englezos, P.; Bygrave, G.; Kalogerakis, N. Interaction parameter estimation in cubic equations of state using binary phase equilibrium and critical point data. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37 (5), 1613-1618.
17. Englezos, P.; Kalogerakis, N.; Bishnoi, P. R. Simultaneous Regression of Binary Vie and Vile Data. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 1990, 61 (1-2), 1-15.
18. Englezos, P.; Kalogerakis, N.; Bishnoi, P. R. A Systematic-Approach for the Efficient Estimation of Interaction Parameters in Equations of State Using Binary Vie Data. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1993, 71 (2), 322-326.
19. Englezos, P.; Kalogerakis, N. Constrained Least-Squares Estimation of Binary Interaction Parameters in Equations of State. Comput.Chem. Eng. 1993, 17 (1), 117-121.
20. Wang, B. G.; Luus, R. Reliability of Optimization Procedures for Obtaining Global Optimum. AIChE J. 1978, 24 (4), 619-626.
21. Liao, B.; Luus, R. Comparison of the Luus-Jaakola optimization procedure and the genetic algorithm. Eng. Optimization 2005, 37 (4), 381-398.
22. Seinfeld, J. S.; Lapidus, L. Mathematical Models in Chemical Engineering; Prentice Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974; Vol. 3.
23. Leis, J. R.; Kramer, M. A. The Simultaneous Solution and Sensitivity Analysis of Systems Described by Ordinary Differential Equations. ACM transactions on Mathematical Software 1988, 14 (1), 45-60.
24. Tan, T. B.; Kalogerakis, A Three-Dimensional Three-Phase Automatic History Matching Model: Reliability of Parameter Estimates. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 1992, 31 (3), 34-41.
25. 2/Al2O3 catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36 (8), 2897-2902.
26. Belohlav, Z.; Zamostny, P.; Kluson, P.; Volf, J. Application of random-search algorithm for regression analysis of catalytic hydrogenations. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1997, 75 (4), 735-742.
27. Barnett, V.; Lewis, T.; Rothamsted, V. Outliers in Statistical Data, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1994.
28. Hawboldt, K. A.; Kalogerakis, N.; Behie, L. A. A. Cellular-Automaton Model for Microcarrier Cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994, 43 (1), 90-100.
29. Frame, K. K.; Hu, W. S. A Model for Density-Dependent Growth of Anchorage-Dependent Mammalian-Cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1988, 32 (8), 1061-1066.
30. Luus, R., Iterative Dynamic Programming; Chapman & Hall/ CRC: New York, 2001.