Formalisation and analysis of the temporal dynamics of conditioning

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3950 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 54-68

  Bosse, Tibor ^a   Jonker, Catholijn M ^b   Los, Sander A ^a   Van Der Torre, Leendert ^c,d   Treur, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c CWI   (Netherlands)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FORMAL LANGUAGES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATTERN MATCHING; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

ADAPTIVE AGENT SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC PROPERTIES; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 33745836127     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11752660_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Balkenius, C. and Morén, J. (1999). Dynamics of a classical conditioning model. Autonomous Robots, 7, 41-56.
2. th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci'03. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., and Treur, J. (2005). Simulation of Conditioning Mechanisms in Agents. In: Balsa, J., Moniz, L., and Reis, L.P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems: Theory and Applications, MASTA'05.
4. Dastard, M., Dignum, F., and Meyer, J-J.Ch. (2003). 3APL: A Programming Language for Cognitive Agents. ERCM News, European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics, Special issue on Cognitive Systems, No. 53.
5. Gallistel, C.R. and Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, vol. 107, pp. 289-344.
6. Jonker, C.M. and Treur, J. (2002). Compositional Verification of Multi-Agent Systems: a Formal Analysis of Pro-activeness and Reactiveness. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, vol. 11, pp. 51-92.
7. Los, S.A., Knol, D.L., and Boers, R.M. (2001). The Foreperiod Effect Revisited: Conditioning as a Basis for Nonspecific Preparation. Acta Psychologica, 106, pp. 121-145.
8. Los, S.A. and van den Heuvel, C.E. (2001). Intentional and Unintentional Contributions to Nonspecific Preparation During Reaction Time Foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 27, pp. 370-386.
9. Machado, A. (1997). Learning the temporal Dynamics of Behaviour. Psychological Review, vol. 104, pp. 241-265.
10. Niemi, P. and Naatanen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and Simple Reaction Time. Psychological Bulletin, vol 89, pp. 133-162.
11. Port, R.F. and van Gelder, T.J. (1995). Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
12. Reiter, R. (2001). Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems. MIT Press.
13. Rist, F. and Cohen, R. (1991). Sequential effects in the reaction times of schizophrenics: crossover and modality shift effects. In E.R. Steinhauer, J.H. Gruzelier, & J. Zubin, Handbook of schizophrenia, vol. 5: Neuropsychology, psychophysiology and information processing (pp. 241-271). Amsterdam: Elsevier.