Trendelenburg positioning does not prevent a decrease in cardiac output after induction of anaesthesia with propofol in children

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 869-874

  Kardos, A ^a   Foldesi C ^a   Nagy, A ^a   Saringer A ^a   Kiss, A ^a   Kiss, G ^a   Marschalko P ^a   Szabo M ^a  

^a HEIM PÁL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Impedance cardiography; Pediatric; Trendelenburg position

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; PROPOFOL;

ADOLESCENT; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG RESPONSE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; END TIDAL CARBON DIOXIDE TENSION; FORWARD HEART FAILURE; HEAD POSITION; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART INDEX; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SUPINE POSITION; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; THERAPY EFFECT; TRENDELENBURG POSITION;

ADOLESCENT; ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BREATH TESTS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; CHILD; FEMALE; FENTANYL; HEAD-DOWN TILT; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PROPOFOL; STROKE VOLUME; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 33745831975     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01073.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aun CST, Sung RYT, O'Meara ME, Short TG, Oh TE. Cardiovascular effects of intravenous induction hi children: comparison between propofol and thiopentone. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 482-5.
2. Assuncao Braga AF, Braga FSS, Poterio GMB, Filier PR, Cremonesi E. The effect of different doses of propofol on tracheal intubating conditions without muscle relaxant in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18: 384-8.
3. Wilcox S, Vandam LD. Alas, poor Trendelenburg and his position! A critique of its uses and effectiveness. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 574-8.
4. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Moerstedt K, Kigler E, Lamm P et al. Trendelenburg positioning after cardiac surgery: effects on intrathoracic blood volume index and cardiac performance. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 17-20.
5. Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M. Hemodynamic changes due to Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 949-55.
6. Terai C, Anada H, Matsushima S, Shimiziu S, Okada Y. Effects of mild Trendelenburg on central hemodynamics and internal jugular vein velocity, cross-sectional area, and flow. Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13: 255-8.
7. Manner T, Aantaa R, Alanen M. Lung compliance during laparoscopic surgery in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 1998; 8: 25-9.
8. Kubicek WG, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA. Impedance cardiography as a non-invasive method of monitoring cardiac function and other parameters of the cardiovascular system. Ann NY Acad Sci 1970; 170: 724-9.
9. Bernstein DP. Continuous non-invasive real-time monitoring of stroke volume and cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. Crit Care Med 1986; 14: 898-900.
10. Castor G, Molter G, Helms J, Niedemark I, Altmayer P. Determination of cardiac output during positive end-expiratory pressure-noninvasive electrical bioimpedance compared with standard thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1990; 18: 544-6.
11. O'Connell AJ, Tibballs J, Coulthard M. Improving agreement between thoracic bioimpedance and dye dilution cardiac output estimation is children. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991; 19: 434-40.
12. Introna RP, Pruett JK, Crumrine RC, Cuadrado AR. Use of transthoracic bioimpedance to determine cardiac output in pediatric patients. Crit Care Med 1988; 16: 1101-5.
13. Braden DS, Leatherbury L, Treiber FA, Strong WB. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output in children using impedance cardiography. Am Heart J 1990; 120: 1166-72.
14. Mezzacappa ES, Kelsey RM, Katkin ES. The effects of epinephrin administration on impedance cardiographic measures of cardiovascular function. J Appl Physiol 1999; 31: 189-96.
15. 2) method of measuring cardiac output in healthy children during exercise. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 745-9.
16. Pianosi P. Impedance cardiography accurately measures cardiac output during exercise in children with cystic fibrosis. Chest 1997; 111: 333-7.
17. Turner RJ, Gatt SP, Kam PCA, Ramzan I, Daley M. Administration of a crystalloid fluid preload does not prevent the decrease in arterial blood pressure after induction of anaesthesia with propofol and fentanyl. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 737-41.
18. Ebert TJ. Sympathetic and haemodynamic effects of moderate and deep sedation with propofol in humans. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 20-4.
19. Mulier JP, Wouters PF, Van Aken H, Vermaut G, Vandermersch E. Cardiodynamic effects of propofol in comparison with thiopental assessment with a transesophageal echocardiographic approach. Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 28-35.
20. 2O in humans. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 157-66.
21. Cybulski G, Michalak E, Kozluk E, Piatkowska A, Niewiadomski W. Stroke volume and systolic time intervals: beat-to-beat comparison between echocardiography and ambulatory impedance cardiography in supine and tilted positions. Med Biol Eng Comput 2004; 42: 707-11.
22. Fahrenberg J, Foerster F, Muller W. Non-invasive estimations of ventricular ejection time and stroke volume: comparison of impedance cardiography and Portapres 2. J Med Eng Technol 1997; 21: 15-22.