Time-course of semantic composition: The case of aspectual coercion

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 233-244

  Piñango, Maria Mercedes ^a   Winnick, Aaron ^b   Ullah, Rashad ^b   Zurif, Edgar ^c  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aspectual coercion; Semantic processing; Syntax semantics correspondence; Time course of integration; Type shifting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

COERCION; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 33745808804     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-006-9013-z     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Briscoe. E., Copestake, A., & Bougarev, B. (1990). Enjoy the paper: Lexical semantics via lexicology. In proceedings of the 13th international conference on Computational Linguistics, Helsinki, 42-47.
2. Chierchia, G. (1984). Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
3. De Swart, H. (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 347-385.
4. Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Linguistic inquiry monograph. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Klein, E., & Sag, I. (1985). Type-driven translation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, 163-202.
6. McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1995). Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 134-157.
7. Moens, M., & Steedman, M. (1987). Temporal ontology in natural language. In 25th ACL Meeting. Stanford, CA, pp. 1-7.
8. Partee, B., & Roth, M. (1983). Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity in meaning, use and interpretation of language. Walter de Gruyter.
9. Pifiango, M. M., Zurif, E., & Jackendoff, R. (1999). Real-time processing implications of aspectual coercion at the syntax-semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(4), 395-414.
10. Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative Lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17, 409-441.
11. Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Shapiro, L. P., & Levine, B. (1990). Verb processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 38, 21-47.
13. Shapiro. L. P., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1987). Sentence processing and the mental, representation of verbs. Cognition, 27, 219-246.
14. Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1989). Verb representation and sentence processing: contextual impenetrability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 223-243.
15. Swinney, D., & Fodor, J. D. (Eds.). (1989). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (Special issue on sentence. processing), 18(1).
16. Swinney, D., & Zurif, E. (1995). Syntactic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language, 50, 225-239.
17. Todorova, M., Straub, K., Badecker, W., & Frank, R. (2000). Aspectual coercion and online computation of sentential aspect. Cognitive Science Society Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
18. Vendler. Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
19. Verkuyl, H. (1993). A theory of aspectuality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Verkuyl, H. J. (1989). Aspectual classes and aspectual compostion. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 39-94.