Using the analytic hierarchy process for evaluating multi-agent system architecture candidates

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3950 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 205-217

  Davidsson, Paul ^a   Johansson, Stefan ^a   Svahnberg, Mikael ^a  

^a BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METRIC SYSTEM; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; LOAD BALANCING; MULTI-AGENT SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE; MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS (MAS);

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 33745807248     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11752660_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. D. R. Anderson, D. J. Sweeney, and T. A. Williams. An Introduction to Management Science: Quantitative Approaches to Decision Making. South Western College Publishing, Cincinnati Ohio, 2000.
2. A. Arvidsson, B. Jennings, L. Angelin, and M. Svensson. On the use of agent technology for IN load control. In Proceedings of the 16th International Teletraffic Congress. Elsevier Science, 1999.
3. A. Berger. Comparison of call gapping and percent blocking for overload control in distributed switching systems and telecommunication networks. IEEE Trans. Commun., 39:574-580, 1991.
4. E. Bodanese and L. Cuthbert. An intelligent channel allocation scheme for mobile networks: An application of agent technology. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, pages 322-333. World Scientific Press, 2001.
5. S. Clearwater, editor. Market-Based Control: Some early lessons. World Scientific, 1996.
6. P. Clements, R. Kazman, and M. Klein. Evaluating Software Architectures. Addison Wesley, 2002.
7. P. R. Cohen. Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1995.
8. P. Davidsson, S. Johansson, and M. Svahnberg. Characterization and evaluation of multiagent system architectural styles. In Software Engineering for Multi-Agent Systems IV, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 2006. To appear.
9. S. Johansson, P. Davidsson, and M. Kristell. Four architectures for dynamic resource allocation. In A. Karmouch, T. Magedanz, and J. Delgado, editors, Mobile Agents for Telecommunication Applications, volume 2521 of LNAI, pages 239-248. Springer Verlag, 2002.
10. J. Karlsson and K. Ryan. A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements. IEEE Software, 14(5):67-74, 1997.
11. J. Karlsson, C. Wohlin, and B. Regnell. An evaluation of methods for prioritizing software requirements. Information and Software Technology, 39(14-15):938-947, 1998.
12. T. Magedanz and R. Popescu-Zeletin. Intelligent Networks. International Thomson Computer Press, 1996.
13. J. McCall. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, chapter Quality Factors, pages 959-969. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1994.
14. T. L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, Inc., New York NY, 1980.
15. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht the Netherlands, 2001.
16. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture - Perspectives on an Emergin Discipline. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ, 1996.
17. M. Shepperd, S. Barker, and M. Aylett. The analytic hierarchy process and almost dataless prediction. In R. J. Kuster, A. Cowderoy, F. Heemstra, and E. P. van Veenendaal, editors, Project Control for Software Quality - Proceedings of ESCOM-SCOPE 99, Maastricht the Netherlands, 1999. Shaker Publishing BV.
18. M. Svahnberg. An industrial study on building consensus around software architectures and quality attributes. Journal of Information and Software Technology, 46(12):805-818, 2004.
19. F. Ygge. Market-Oriented Programming and its Application to Power Load Management. PhD thesis, Lund University, Sweden, 1998.