Effects of color heterogeneity on subitization

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 319-326

  Watson, Derrick G ^a   Maylor, Elizabeth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33745801362     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193679     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ATKINSON, J., CAMPBELL, F. W., & FRANCIS, M. R. (1976). The magic number 4±0: A new look at visual numerosity judgements. Perception, 5, 327-334.
2. FOUND, A., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension- weighting" account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
3. FRICK, R. W. (1987). The homogeneity effect in counting. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 8-16.
4. HUNTER, W. S., & SIGLER, M. (1940). The span of visual discrimination as a function of time and intensity of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 160-179.
5. INTRILIGATOR, J., & CAVANAGH, P. (1997). Individuation and the resolution of attention [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 38, 3209.
6. KAUFMAN, E. L., LORD, M. W., REESE, T. W., & VOLKMAN, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
7. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
8. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977-991.
9. MANDLER, G., & SHEBO, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1-22.
10. MÜLLER, H. J., HELLER, D., & ZIEGLER, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
11. PUTS, M. J. H., & DE WEERT, C. M. M. (1997). Does color influence subitization? Acta Psychologica, 97, 71-78.
12. PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition, 32, 65-97.
13. PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (2000). Situating vision in the world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 197-207.
14. PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80, 127-158.
15. PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & STORM, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
16. RANDALL, G. (1998). The temporal binding of visual features and their role in enumeration. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham, U.K.
17. RASTLE, K., & DAVIS, M. H. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 307-314.
18. SVENSON, O., & SJÖBERG, K. (1983). Speeds of subitizing and counting processes in different age groups. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 142, 203-211.
19. TREISMAN, A. [M.] (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
20. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
21. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
22. TRICK, L. M., & ENNS, J. T. (1997). Clusters precede shapes in perceptual organization. Psychological Science, 8, 124-129.
23. TRICK, L. M., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 331-351.
24. TRICK, L. M., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102.
25. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 946-962.
26. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1999). The magic number four and temporo-parietal damage: Neurological impairments in counting targets amongst distractors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 609-629.
27. WATSON, D. G., MAYLOR, E. A., & BRUCE, L. A. M. (2005a). Effects of age on searching for and enumerating targets that cannot be detected efficiently. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1119-1142.
28. WATSON, D. G., MAYLOR, E. A., & BRUCE, L. A. M. (2005b). The efficiency of feature-based subitization and counting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1449-1462.
29. WATSON, D. G., MAYLOR, E. A., & MANSON, N. J. (2002). Aging and enumeration: A selective deficit for the subitization of targets among distractors. Psychology & Aging, 17, 496-504.
30. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
31. WOLFE, J. M., BUTCHER, S. J., LEE, C., & HYLE, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 483-502.
32. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.