Measuring virtual student-student cooperation. A case study on the evaluation of cooperative learning in a virtual distributed computer and law course

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 269-284

  Nett, Bernhard ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FIT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745795344     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/2QNE-XW85-UXP1-FUTE     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Arnold, R., & Siebert, H. (1997). Konstruktivistische Erwachsenenbildung [Constructive adult education]. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider.
2. Cleesman, R., & Heileson, S. B. (1999). Supporting problem-based learning in groups in a net environment. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL1999), Palo Alto, CA.
3. De Paula, R., Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (1999). Courses as seeds: Expectations and realities. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL 1999), Palo Alto, CA.
4. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (Eds.). (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constnictivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(40), 50-72.
6. Greeno, J. G., Smith, D. R., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Stemberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition and instruction (pp. 99-167). Ablex Publishing.
7. Huber, B., & Röhr, F. (2004). Ergebnisse der begleitenden Evaluation von RION [Results of the evaluation of the RION project]. In B. Schinzel, J. Taeger, P. Gorny, Th. Dreier, & B. Holznagel. E-Leanting im Hochschulverbund, Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
8. Jansen, W. v.d. Hooven, H. M., Jägers, H. P. M., Steenbakkers, G. C. A. (2002). The added value of e-Leaming. Paper presented at the Informing Science and Education Conference (IS2002), Cork, Ireland.
9. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). The computer and the mind. An introduction to cognitive science. London: Fontana.
10. Jonassen, D. H., McAleese, T. M. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1993). A manifesto for a constructivist approach to technology in higher education. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), The design of constructivistic learning environments: Implications for instructional design and the use of technology. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
11. Kerres, M. (1998). Multimediale und telemediale Lernumgebungen: Konzeption und Entwicklung [Digital multimedia learning platforms: Design and development]. München: Oldenbourg.
12. Kienle, A., & Wessner, M. (2005). Principles for cultivating scientific communities of practice. In P. Van den Besselaer, G. De Michelis, J. Preece, & C. Simone (Eds.), Communities and technologies 2005, Doordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
13. Kilian, W. (2001). Warum Rechtsinformatik? [Computer & Law - Why?] Computer und Recht, 17(2), 132-135.
14. Leutner, D. (1992). Adaptive Lehrsysteme, instruktionspsychologische Grundlagen und experimentelle Analysen [Adaption training system, basic principles of the psychology of instruction and experimental analyses]. Weinheim: Beltz.
15. Moallem, M. (2001). Applying constructivist and objectivist learning theories in the design of a Web-based course: Implications for practice. Education Technology & Society, 4(3), pp. 113-125.
16. Müller, K. (1996). Constructivism: Teaching, learning, aesthetic processes. Knipel, Berlin: Luchterhand.
17. Nett, B. (2003). Identifying learning scenarios for a MOO in an academic learning context. Paper presented at the IADIS Conference "e-Society 2003," Lisbon, Portugal.
18. Nett, B., & Röhr, F. (2002). JurMOO - Cooperative spaces in computer & law teaching. Paper presented at the Conference on Advances in Infrastructure for e-Business, E-Education, E-Science, and E-Medicine on the Internet (SSGRR2002), Alquila, Italy.
19. Nett, B., Remmele, B., Schinzel, B. (2004). Anforderungsanalyse und Zielbestimmung im Projekt RION. In B. Schinzel, J. Taeger, P. Gorny, TH. Dreier, & B. Holznagel (Eds.), E-Learning im Hochschulverbund. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
20. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Remmele, B., Nett, B., Roehr, F., Schinzel, B., Stingl, B., & Walloschke, T. (2002). Diversify, diversify, diversify! Why gender mainstreaming in educational media does not mean one size fits all. Montreal, Canada.
22. Remmele, B., & Walloschke, T. (2004). Entwicklung hypermedialer Lernarrangements im Seminarbetrieb des Verbundprojekts RION [The development of educational hypermedia in seminars of the RION project]. In B. Schinzel, J. Taeger, P. Gorney, Th. Dreier, & B. Holznagel (Eds.), E-Learning im Hochschulverbund. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
23. Rogoff, B., Matsuov, E., & White, C. (1998). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. R. Olsen & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human developments. New models of learning, teaching and schooling (pp. 338-414). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24. Schinzel, B. (2001). E-Learning für alle: Gendersensitive Mediendidaktik [E-learning for all: Gender-sensitive media didactics]. In U. Ernst (Ed.), Gender und neue Medien [Gender and new media]. Innsbruck, Austria: Universitätsdruckerei Innsbruck.
25. Schmidt, S. J. (1994). Kognitive Autonomie und soziale Orientierung. Konstruktivistische Bemerkungen zum Zusammenhang von Kognition, Kommunikation, Medien und Kultur [Cognitive autonomy and social orientation. Constructivist remarks on the relation before cognition, communication, media and culture]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
26. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
27. Schulmeister, R. (1997). Grundlagen hypermedialer Lernsysteme: Theorie, Didaktik, Design [Fundamentals of educational hypermedia systems: Theory, didactics, design] (2nd ed.). München, Germany: Oldenbourg.
28. Siebert, H. (1999). Pädogogischer Konstruktivismus. Eine Bilanz der Konstruktivismus - Diskussion für die Bildungspraxis [Educational constructivism. A balance of the discussion about constructivism for educational practice]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Luchterhand.
29. Skinner, B. F. (1963). Reflections on a decade of teaching machines. Teachers College Record, 65, pp. 768-777.
30. Specht, M. (1998). Adaptive methoden in computerbasierten Lehr-/Lernsystemen (No. 24) [Adaptive methods in computer-based learning/teaching systems]. St. Augustin, Germany: GMD Research Series.
31. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P., Jacobson, M., & Coulson, R. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57-75). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Stingl, B. (2004). Neue Medien in der Hochschulbildung: Problemfelder und Perspektiven. In B. Schinzel, J. Taeger, P. Gorny, Th. Dreier, & B. Holznagel (Eds.), E-Learning im hochschulverbund, Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsvertag.
33. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated action. The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.