An empirical study of the impact of asynchronous discussions on remote synchronous requirements meetings

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3922 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 155-169

  Damian, Daniela ^a   Lanubile, Filippo ^b   Mallardo, Teresa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLIENT SERVER COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ASYNCHRONOUS DISCUSSIONS; EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT; GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED LOCATIONS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 33745784125     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11693017_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. [Bas96] V. R. Basili, S. Green, O. Laitenberger, F. Lanubile, F. Shull, S. Sørumgård, and M. Zelkowitz. The empirical investigation of Perspective-Based Reading. Empirical Software Engineering: An International Journal, 1 (2): 133-164, 1996.
2. [Bas99] V. Basili, F. Shull, and F. Lanubile. Building Knowledge through Families of Experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(4): 456-473, July/August 1999.
3. [Bif03] S. Biffl, and M. Halling. Investigating the Defect Detection Effectiveness and Cost Benefit of Nominal Inspection Teams. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29 (5): 385-397, May 2003.
4. [Boe81] B. W. Boehm. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs: NJ, 1981.
5. [Boe98] B.W. Boehm, A. Egyed, J. Kwan, D. Port, A. Shah, R. Madachy. Using the Win-Win Spiral Model: A Case Study. Computer, 31(7): 33-44, July 1998.
6. [Dam03] D. Damian, and D. Zowghi. Requirements Engineering challenges in multi-site software development organizations. Requirements Engineering Journal, 8: 149-160, 2003.
7. [Fag76] M.E. Fagan, Design and code inspection to reduce errors in program development. IBM Systems Journal, 15(3), 1976, 182-211.
8. [Gen01] M. van Genuchten, C. van Dijk, H. Scholten, and D. Vogel, Using Group Support Systems for Software Inspections, IEEE Software, 18(3): 60-65, 2001.
9. [Grü04] P. Grünbacher, M. Halling, S. Biffl, H. Kitapci, and B.W. Boehm. Integrating Collaborative Processes and Quality Assurance Techniques: Experiences from Requirements Negotiation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(4): 9-29, 2004.
10. [Hal03] M. Halling, S. Biffl, and P. Grünbacher. An economic approach for improving requirements negotiation models with inspection. Requirements Engineering Journal, 8: 236-247, 2003.
11. [Her03] J.D. Herbsieb, A. Mockus. An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally-Distributed Software Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(3): 1-14, 2003.
12. [Lai00] O. Laitenberger, and J.M. DeBaud. An encompassing life cycle centric survey of software inspection. The Journal of Systems and Software, 50 (1): 5-31, January 2000.
13. [Lai02] O. Laitenberger, T. Beil, and T. Schwinn. An Industrial Case Study to Examine a Non-Traditional Inspection Implementation for Requirements Specifications. Empirical Software Engineering, 7(4): 345-374, December 2002.
14. [Lan98] F. Lanubile, F. Shull, V. Basili, "Experimenting with error abstraction in requirements documents", 5th Int. Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS '98), pp.114-121, 1998.
15. [Lan03] F. Lanubile, T. Mallardo, and F. Calefalo. Tool Support for Geographically Dispersed Inspection Teams. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 8(4): 217-231, October/December 2003.
16. [Lan04] F. Lanubile, and T. Mallardo. A Preliminary Study On Asynchronous Discussions For Distributed Software Inspections. Proc. of the Workshop on Cooperative Support for Distributed Software Engineering Processes (CSSE 2004), September 2004.
17. [Per02] D.E. Perry, A.A. Porter, M.W. Wade, L.G. Votta, and J. Perpich. Reducing Inspection Interval in Large-Scale Software Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(7): 695-705, 2002
18. [Por95] A.A. Porter, L.G. Votta, V.R. Basili. Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspections: A replicated experiment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(6): 563-575, 1995.
19. [Sch92] G. M. Schneider, J. Martin, and W. Tsai. An experimental study of fault detection in user requirements documents. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 1 (2): 188-204, April 1992.
20. [The03] T. Thelin, P. Runeson, and C. Wohlin. An Experimental Comparison of Usage-Based and Checklist-Based Reading. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(8): 687-704, August 2003.