Decentralized coordination of transactional processes in peer-to-peer environments

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 28-35

  Haller, Klaus ^a   Schuldt, Heiko ^b   Türker, Can ^c  

^a AWK Group AG   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Decentralized Coordination; DSGT; Global Correctness; Partial Rollback; Peer toPeer Communication; Transactional Processes

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZED COORDINATION; DSGT; GLOBAL CORRECTNESS; PARTIAL ROLLBACK; PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATION; TRANSACTIONAL PROCESSES;

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PERFORMANCE; QUERY LANGUAGES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 33745780942     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1099554.1099563     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. P. A. Bernstein, V. Hadzilacos, and N. Goodman. Concurrency Control and Recovery in Database Systems. Addison-Wesley, 1987.
2. Y. Breitbart, H. Garcia-Molina, and A. Silberschatz. Overview of Multidatabase Transaction Management. VLDB Journal, 1(2):181-240, 1992.
3. D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, and F. Manola. Customizing Transaction Models and Mechanisms in a Programmable Environment Supporting Reliable Workflow Automation. IEEE TKDE, 8(4):630-649, 1996.
4. J. Gray, P. Helland, P. O'Neil, and D. Shasha. The Dangers of Replication and a Solution. In Proc. 1996 ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pages 173-182, 1996.
5. K. Haller, H. Schuldt, and C. Türker. A Fully Decentralized Approach to Coordinating Transactional Processes in Peer-to-Peer Environments. Technical Report 463, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, October 2004. ftp://ftp.inf.ethz.ch/pub/ publications/ tech-reports/4xx/463.pdf.
6. IBM. WebSphere Application Process Choreographer. http: //www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/zones/was/wpc.html.
7. N. Krivokapic, A. Kemper, and E. Gudes. Deadlock Detection in Distributed Database Systems: A New Algorithm and a Comparative Performance Analysis. VLDB Journal, 8(2):79-100, 1999.
8. H. Kung and J. Robinson. On optimistic Methods for Concurrency Control. ACM TODSs, 6(2), 1981.
9. E. Levy, H. Korth, and A. Silberschatz. An Optimistic Commit Protocol for Distributed Transaction Management. In Proc. of ACM SIGMOD, pages 8897, 1991.
10. R. Obermarck. Distributed Deadlock Detection Algorithm. ACM TODS, 7(2): 187-208, 1982.
11. M. T. Özsu and P. Valduriez. Principles of Distributed Database Systems. Prentice Hall, 2nd edition, 1999.
12. M. Roesler and W. A. Burkhard. Resolution of Deadlocks in Object-Oriented Distributed Systems. IEEE Transactions on Computing, pages 1212-1224, August 1989.
13. H. Schuldt, G. Alonso, C. Beeri, and H.-J. Schek. Atomicity and Isolation for Transactional Processes. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 27(1):63-l 16, March 2002.
14. C. Turker, K. Haller, C. Schuler, and H.-J. Schek. How can we support Grid Transactions? Towards Peer-to-Peer Transaction Processing. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, CIDR 2005, pages 174-185, 2005.
15. R. Vingralek, H. Hasse-Ye, Y. Breitbart, and H.-J. Schek. Unifying Concurrency Control and Recovery of Transactions with Semantically Rich Operations. Theoretical Computer Science, 190(2), 1998.
16. G. Weikum and G. Vossen. Transactional Information Systems; Theory, Algorithms, and Practice of Concurrency Control and Recovery. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2001.