Anesthesiologist-controlled versus patient-controlled propofol sedation for shockwave lithotripsy

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 449-455

  Alhashemi, Jamal A ^a   Kaki, Abdullah M ^a  

^a KING ABDUL AZIZ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; ANESTHESIST; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG DOSE REGIMEN; DRUG INFUSION; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTANESTHESIA CARE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR ACTIVITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEDATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UROLITHIASIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 33745778273     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03022616     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Chin CM, Tay KP, Ng FC, Lim PH, Chng HC. Use of patient-controlled analgesia in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 848-51.
2. Joo HS, Perks WJ, Kataoka MT, Errett L, Pace K, Honey RJ. A comparison of patient-controlled sedation using either remifentanil or remifentanil-propofol for shock wave lithotripsy. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 1227-32.
3. Alhashemi JA, Kaki AM. Dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine PCA provides superior analgesia for shockwave lithotripsy. Can J Anesth 2004; 51: 342-7.
4. Beloeil H, Corsia G, Coriat P, Riou B. Remifentanil compared with sufentanil during extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy with spontaneous ventilation: a double-blind, randomized study. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 567-70.
5. Burmeister MA, Brauer P, Wintruff M, Graefen M, Blanc I, Standl TG. A comparison of anaesthetic techniques for shock wave lithotripsy: the use of a remifentanil infusion alone compared to intermittent fentanyl boluses combined with a low dose propofol infusion. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 877-81.
6. Ge SJ, Zhuang XL, Wang YT, Wang ZD, Li HT. Changes in the rapidly extracted auditory evoked potentials index and the bispectral index during sedation induced by propofol or midazolam under epidural block. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 260-4.
7. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Scaling responses. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR (Eds). Health Measurement Scales: a Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 2nd ed. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 1995: 28, 53.
8. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990; 10: 244-51.
9. Newman MG, Trieger N, Miller JC. Measuring recovery from anesthesia - a simple test. Anesth Analg 1969; 48: 136-40.
10. Chung F, Chan VW, Ong D. A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 500-6.
11. Bright E, Roseveare C, Dalgleish D, Kimble J, Elliott J, Shepherd H. Patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized trial comparing patient-controlled administration of propofol and alfentanil with physician-administered midazolam and pethidine. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 683-7.
12. Kortis HI, Amory DW, Wagner BK, et al. Use of patient-controlled analgesia with alfentanil for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 205-10.
13. Suttner S, Boldt J, Schmidt C, Piper S, Kumle B. Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 77-82.