Patterns of daily temporal variation in detectability of forest birds in Bolivia

Ornitologia Neotropical

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 337-346

  Woltmann, Stefan ^a,b  

^a The University of Southern Mississippi   (United States)

^b Tulane University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bolivia; Census methods; Detectability; Forestry concession; Survey design; Tropical forest bird communities

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745777413     PISSN: 10754377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. th ed. American Ornithologists' Union, Lawrence, Kansas.
2. Bates, J. M., D. F. Stotz, & T. S. Schulenberg. 1998. Avifauna of Parque Nacional Noel Kempff Mercado. Pp. 112-119 in Killeen, T. J. & T. S. Schulenberg (eds.) A biological assessment of Parque Nacional Noel Kempff Mercado, Bolivia. RAP Working Papers 10, Conservation International, Washington, D.C.
3. Blake, J. G. 1992. Temporal variation in point counts of birds in a lowland wet forest in Costa Rica. Condor 94: 265-275.
4. Buckland, S. T., D. L. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers, & L. Thomas. 2001. Introduction to distance sampling: estimating the abundance of biological populations. Oxford Univ., Cornwall, UK.
5. Casagrande, D. G., & S. R. Beissinger. 1997. Evaluation of four methods for estimating parrot population size. Condor 99: 445-457.
6. Cohn-Haft, M., A. Whittaker, & P. C. Stouffer. 1997. A new look at the "species-poor" central Amazon: the avifauna north of Manaus, Brazil. Ornithol. Monogr. 48: 205-235.
7. Farnsworth, G., K. H. Pollock, J. D. Nichols, T. R. Simons, J. E. Hines, & J. R. Sauer. 2002. A removal model for estimating the detection probability during point counts divided into time intervals. Auk 119: 414-425.
8. Karr, J. R. 1981. Surveying birds in the tropics. Stud. Avian Biol. 6: 548-553.
9. Karr, J. R., S. K. Robinson, J. G. Blake, & R. O. Bierregaard, Jr. 1990. Birds of four Neotropical forests. Pp. 237-269 in Gentry, A. H. (ed.). Four Neotropical rainforests. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
10. Lynch, J. F. 1995. Effects of point count duration, time-of-day, and aural stimuli on detectability of migratory and resident bird species in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Pp. 1-6 in Ralph, C. J., J. R. Sauer, & S. Droege (eds.). Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Pacific SW Forest Research Station, US Dept. of Agriculture, PSW-GTR-149.
11. Nichols, J. D., J. E. Hines, J. R. Sauer, F. W. Fallon, J. W. Fallon, & P. J. Heglund. 2000. A double observer approach for estimating detection probability and abundance from point counts. Auk 117: 393-408.
12. Parker, T. A., III, D. F. Stotz, & J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for Neotropical birds. Pp. 132-291 in Stotz, D. F., J. W. Fitzpatrick, T. A. Parker, III, & D. K. Moskovits (eds.). Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
13. Pinard, M. A., F. E. Putz, & J. C. Licona. 1999. Tree mortality and vine proliferation following a wildfire in a subhumid tropical forest in eastern Bolivia. For. Ecol. Manage. 116: 247-252.
14. Pollock, K. H., H. H. Marsh, L. L. Bailey, G. L. Farnsworth, T. R. Simons, & M. W. Alldredge. In press. Methodology for separating components of detection probability in population abundance estimation: an overview with diverse examples. In Thompson, W. L. (ed.). Sampling rare or elusive species: concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
15. Poulsen, B. O., & N. Krabbe. 1998. Avifaunal diversity of five high-altitude cloud forests on the Andean western slope of Ecuador: testing a rapid assessment method. J. Biogeog. 25: 83-93.
16. Ralph, C. J., & J. M. Scott. 1981. Estimating numbers of terrestrial birds. Stud. Avian Biol. 6: 1-630.
17. Remsen, J. V., & D. A. Good. 1996. Misuse of data from mist-net captures to assess relative abundance in bird populations. Auk 113: 381-398.
18. Robinson, W. D., J. D. Brawn, & S. K. Robinson. 2000. Forest bird community structure in central Panama: influence of spatial scale and biogeography. Ecol. Monog. 70: 209-235.
19. Rosenstock, S. S., D. R. Anderson, K. M. Giesen, T. Leukering, & M. F. Carter. 2002. Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. Auk 119: 46-53.
20. Terborgh, J., S. K. Robinson, T. A. Parker, III, C. A. Munn, & N. Pierpont. 1990. Structure and organization of an Amazonian forest bird community. Ecol. Monog. 60: 213-238.
21. Thiollay, J.-M. 1994. Structure, density and rarity in an Amazonian rainforest bird community. J. Trop. Ecol. 10: 449-481.
22. Verner, J. 1985. Assessment of counting techniques. Curr. Ornithol. 2: 247-301.
23. Waide, R. B., & P. M. Narins. 1988. Tropical forest bird counts and the effect of sound attenuation. Auk 105: 296-302.
24. Whitman, A. A., J. M. Hagan, & N. V. L. Brokaw. 1997. A comparison of two bird survey techniques used in a subtropical forest. Condor 99: 955-965.
25. Woltmann, S. 2003. Bird community responses to disturbance in a forestry concession in lowland Bolivia. Biodivers. Conserv. 12: 1921-1936.
26. th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.