In-order-to analysis: An alternative to classifying different levels of occupational activity

British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 161-168

  Paley, John ^a   Eva, Gail ^a,b   Duncan, Edward A S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CODING; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PRACTICE; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; THINKING; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

EID: 33745771739     PISSN: 03080226     EISSN: 14776006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030802260606900403     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Occupational Therapy Association (1995) Position paper: occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(10), 1015-18.
2. Bailey KD (1994) Typologies and taxonomies: an introduction to classification in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR (1956) Taxonomy of educational objective: the classification of educational goals. Handbook I - Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
4. Christiansen C, Baum C (1997) Occupational therapy: enabling function and wellbeing. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
5. Creek J (2005) Letter to the Editor. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(2), 125.
6. Davis JA, Polatajko HJ (2005) Letter to the Editor. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(2), 125-27.
7. Davis JA, Mandich A, Polatajko HJ (2005) Letter to the Editor. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(4), 190-91.
8. Ereshefsky M (2001) The poverty of the Linnean hierarchy: a philosophical study of biological taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ereshefsky M, Matthen M (2005) Taxonomy, polymorphism, and history: an introduction to population structure theory. Philosophy of Science, 72(1), 1-21.
10. Eva G, Paley J (2005) Letter to the Editor. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(4), 189-90.
11. Golledge J (1998) Distinguishing between occupation, purposeful activity and activity. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(3), 100-105.
12. Hagedorn R (1995) Occupational therapy: perspectives and processes. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
13. Hagedorn R (2000) Tools for practice in occupational therapy: a structured approach to core skills and processes. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
14. Haglund L, Henriksson C (1995) Activity - from action to activity. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 9(4), 227-34.
15. Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: The Free Press.
16. Henderson A (1996) The scope of occupational science. In: R Zemke, F Clarke, eds. Occupational science: the evolving discipline. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
17. Hull D (1998) Taxonomy. In: E Craig, ed. Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy, Volume 9. London: Routledge, 272-76.
18. Johnson SE (1996) Activity analysis. In: A Turner, M Foster, SE Johnson, eds. Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
19. Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS, Masia BB (1964) Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook II - Affective domain. New York: David McKay.
20. Levine RE, Brayley CR (1991) Occupation as a therapeutic medium. In: C Christiansen, C Baum, eds. Occupational therapy: overcoming human performance deficits. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
21. Lewis D (1984) Putnam's paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62(3), 221-36.
22. Marradi A (1990) Classification, typology, taxonomy. Quality and Quantity, XXIV, 129-57.
23. Mattingly C (1991) What is clinical reasoning? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(11), 979-87.
24. Mattingly C, Fleming MH (1994) Clinical reasoning: forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
25. Polatajko HJ, Davis JA, Hobson SJG, Landry JE, Mandich A, Street SL, Whippey E, Yee S (2004) Meeting the responsibility that comes with privilege: introducing a taxonomic code for understanding occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(5), 261-68.
26. Quicke DLJ (1993) Principles and techniques of contemporary taxonomy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
27. Schuh RT (1999) Biological systematics: principles and applications. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.
28. Smith B (2004) Carving up reality. In: M Gorman, J Sanford, eds. Categories: historical and systematic essays. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 225-37.
29. Sober E, ed. (1994) Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Sokal RR, Sneath PHA (1963) Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman.
31. Young M, Quinn E (1992) Theories and practice of occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.