Simplifying data collection for process evaluation of community coalition activities - An electronic web-based application

Health Promotion Journal of Australia

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 48-53

  Turner, Catherine ^a   Yorkston, Emily ^a   Hart, Kelly ^b   Drew, Lynette ^b   McClure, Rod ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b TROPICAL PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT   (Australia)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community coalition; Evaluation; Event log; Prevention research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; DOCUMENTATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

COMMUNITY NETWORKS; DATA COLLECTION; DOCUMENTATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERNET; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 33745764332     PISSN: 10361073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/he06048     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Swerissen H, Crisp B. The sustainability of health promotion interventions for different levels of social organisation. Health Promot Int. 2004; 19:123-30.
2. Moller J. Community-based interventions: an emerging dimension of injury control models. Health Promot J Aust. 1991;1:51-4.
3. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:119-27.
4. Chrisman NJ, Senturia K, Tang G, Gheisar B. Qualitative process evaluation of urban community work: a preliminary view. Health Educ Behav. 2002;29:232-48.
5. Pate RR, Saunders RP, Ward DS, Felton G, Trost SG, Dowda M. Evaluation of a community-based intervention to promote physical activity in youth: lessons from Active Winners. Am J Health Promot. 2003;17:171-82.
6. Parker EA, Israel BA, Williams M, Brakefield-Caldwell W, Lewis TC, Robins T. Community action against asthma: examining the partnership process of a community-based participatory research project. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:558-67.
7. Reed PS, Foley KL, Hatch J, Mutran EJ. Recruitment of older African Americans for survey research: a process evaluation of the community and church-based strategy in the Durham Elders Project. Gerontologist. 2003;43:52-61.
8. Simmons D, Voyle JA. Reaching hard-to-reach, high-risk populations: piloting a health promotion and diabetes disease prevention programme on an urban marae in New Zealand. Health Promot Int. 2003;18:41-50.
9. Francisco VT, Paine AL, Fawcett SB. A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Health Educ Res. 1993;8:403-16.
10. Sterling TD, Schmidt TL, Fawcett SB, Paine-Andrews A, Harris KL. Francisco VT. Evaluating Community Efforts to Prevent Cardiovascular Diseases. Atlanta (GA): United States Department of Health and Human Services; 1995.
11. Goodman RM, Wandersman A, Chinman M, Imm P, Morrissey E. An ecological assessment of community-based interventions for prevention and health promotion: approaches to measuring community coalitions. Am J Community Psychol. 1996;24:33-61.
12. Fawcett SB, Lewis RK, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, Richter KP, Williams EL, et al. Evaluating community coalitions for prevention of substance abuse: the case of Project Freedom. Health Educ Behav. 1997;24:812-28.
13. Chalmers ML, Housemann PA, Wiggs I, Newcomb-Hagood L, Malone B, Brownson RC. Process evaluation of a monitoring log system for community coalition activities: Five-year results and lessons learned. Am J Health Promot. 2003;17:190-6.
14. Spinks A, McClure R, Nixon J, Turner C. Effectiveness of the WHO safe communities model to prevent injury in whole populations. In: The Cochrane Library, 2005;Apr 18(2). Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2005.
15. Spinks A, Turner C, McClure R, Nixon J. Community-based intervention programs targeting all injuries in children 0-16 years: a systematic review. Injury Prev. 2004;10:180-5.