Flaws in the review [2]

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 277-278

  Byfield, David ^a   McCarthy, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLIC; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; LETTER; LOW BACK PAIN; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; PUBLICATION; SPINAL PAIN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; BACKACHE; LITERATURE; NOTE;

BACK PAIN; HUMANS; MANIPULATION, SPINAL; REVIEW LITERATURE;

EID: 33745762951     PISSN: 01410768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.99.6.277-a     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Ernst E, Canter P H. A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulations. J R Soc Med 2006;99:192-6
2. Meeker WC, Haldeman, S. Chiropractic: a profession at the crossroads of mainstream and alternative medicine. Ann Internal Med 2002, 136:216-7
3. UK BEAM Trial Team. United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 2004 [doi:10.1136/bmj.38282.607859.AE]
4. Hurwitz E, Morgenstern H, Korninski GF, Yu F, Chiang L. A randomised trial of chiropractic and medical care for patients for low back pain: eighteen-month follow up of outcomes from the UCLA low back pain study. Spine 2006;31:611-21
5. Assendelft WJJ, Morton SC, Yu Emily I, Suttorp M, Shekelle PG. Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; Issue 1