|
Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 819-826
|
Evaluation and comparison of the electrostatic dust print lifter and the electrostatic detection apparatus2 on the development of footwear impressions on paper
c
NONE
(United States)
|
Author keywords
Dust print; Electrostatic Detection Apparatus 2; Electrostatic Dust Print Lifter; Footwear impression; Forensic science; Indented; Individual characteristics; Shoe impression
|
Indexed keywords
ASPHALT;
CEMENT;
NYLON;
ANALYTIC METHOD;
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT;
CERAMICS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONFERENCE PAPER;
DUST;
ELECTROSTATIC DETECTION;
ELECTROSTATIC DETECTION APPARATUS;
ELECTROSTATIC DUST PRINT LIFTER;
ELECTROSTATIC LIFTING;
FOAM;
FORENSIC SCIENCE;
GRASS;
MULCH;
PAPER;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY CONTROL;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SHOE;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
ELECTROSTATICS;
FORENSIC MEDICINE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PAPER;
SHOES;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
|
EID: 33745744840
PISSN: 00221198
EISSN: 15564029
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00173.x Document Type: Conference Paper |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (7)
|