A framework for evaluating health promotion programs

Health Promotion Journal of Australia

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 61-66

  O'Connor Fleming, Mary Louise ^a   Parker, Elizabeth ^a   Higgins, Helen ^a   Gould, Trish ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 33745737216     PISSN: 10361073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/he06061     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Stufflebeam DL. Evaluation Models. New Directions for Evaluation. 2001;89:7-98.
2. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. 3rd ed. Mountain View (CA): Mayfield Publishing; 1999.
3. World Health Organization. Health Promotion Evaluation: Recommendations to Policymakers. Report of the WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation. Copenhagen (DNK): WHO; 1998.
4. Sparks M. Why Evaluate? Healthlink J. 2004;4 Autumn:2.
5. McKenzie JF, Smeltzer JL. Planning, Implementing, and Evaluating Health Promotion Programs: A Primer. 3rd ed. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
6. Windsor RA. Evaluation of Health Promotion, Health Education and Disease Prevention Programs, 3rd ed. Mountain View (CA): Mayfield Publishing; 2004.
7. Nutbeam D. Evaluating Health Promotion - Progress, Problems and Solutions. Health Promot Int. 1998; 13(1):27-44.
8. Tones K. Evaluating health promotion: a tale of three errors. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:227-36.
9. Wimbush E, Watson J. An Evaluation Framework for Health Promotion: Theory, Quality and Effectiveness. Evaluation. 2000;6(3):301-21.
10. Oakley A. Evaluating health promotion: methodological diversity. In: Oliver S, Peersman G, editors. Using Research for Effective Health Promotion. Buckingham (UK): Open University Press; 2001.
11. Tones K, Tilford S. Health Promotion: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity. 3rd ed. Cheltenham (UK): Nelson Thomes; 2001.
12. White I. What should you evaluate? Healthlink J. 2004;4 Autumn:2.
13. Baum F. The New Public Health. 2nd ed. Melbourne (AUST): Oxford University Press; 2002.
14. Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Rootman I, Springett, J. Evaluation in health promotion: Synthesis and recommendations. In: Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen D, Potvin L, Springett J, et al, editors. Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives. Copenhagen (DNK): World Health Organization; 2001.
15. Hawe P, Degeling D, Hall J. Evaluating Health Promotion: A Health Workers Guide. Sydney (AUST): MacLennan and Petty; 2003.
16. South J, Tilford S. Perceptions of research and evaluation in health promotion practice and influences on activity. Health Educ Res. 2000;15(6):729-41.
17. Judd J, Frankish CJ, Moulton G. Setting standards in the evaluation of community-based health promotion programmes - a unifying approach. Health Promot Int. 2001;16(4):367-80.
18. McQueen D. Strengthening the Evidence Base for Health Promotion. Health Promot Int. 2001;16(3):261-8.
19. Aro AA, van den Broucke S, Räty S. Toward European consensus tools for reviewing the evidence and enhancing the quality of health promotion practice. The challenge of getting evidence into practice: current debates and future strategies. Promot Educ 2005; Suppl 1:10-14.
20. Jones C, Scriven A. Where are we headed? The next frontier for the evidence of effectiveness in the European Region. The challenge of getting evidence into practice: current debates and future strategies. Promot Educ. 2005; Suppl 1:39-40.
21. Jones C, McQueen DV. The European Region's contribution to the Global Programme on Health Promotion Effectiveness (GPHPE). The challenge of getting evidence into practice: current debates and future strategies. Promot Educ 2005; Suppl 1:9-10.
22. Saan H. The road to evidence: the European path. The challenge of getting evidence into practice: current debates and future strategies. Promot Educ 2005; Suppl 1:6-7.
23. Tones K. Evaluating Health Promotion: Beyond the RCT. In: Best Practices Quality and Effectiveness of Health Promotion: Proceedings of the 4th European International Union for Health Promotion and Education (IUHPE) Conference; 1999 May 16-19; Helsinki, Finland.
24. O'Connor-Fleming ML, Parker E. Health Promotion: Principle and Practice in the Australian Context. 2nd ed. Sydney (AUST): Allen and Unwin; 2001.
25. Issel L. Health Program Planning and Evaluation: A Practical, Systematic Approach for Community Health. London (UK): Jones and Bartlett; 2004.
26. Glasgow RE. Evaluation of theory-based interventions. In: Glanz K, Lewis ML, Rimer BK, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 530-44.
27. Nutbeam D, Harris E. Theory in a Nutshell: A Practical Guide to Health Promotion Theories. 2nd ed. Sydney (AUST): McGraw-Hill; 2004.