No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy - A preliminary study

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 682-687

  Oscarsson, Ulf ^a   Sundström Poromaa, Inger ^b   Nüssler, Emil ^a   Löfgren, Mats ^c  

^a Skellefteå Lasarett ^*  (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Disability days; Hospital stay; Laparoscopic surgery; Multimodal; Patient satisfaction; Supravaginal hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ABDOMINAL SUPRAVAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; LAPAROSCOPIC SUPRAVAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MENSTRUAL IRREGULARITY; MULTIMODAL INTERVENTION PROGRAM; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING; UTERUS TUMOR; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICK LEAVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33745714427     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340600593455     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ellstrom MA, Astrom M, Moller A, Olsson JH, Hahlin M. A randomized trial comparing changes in psychological well-being and sexuality after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:871-5.
2. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Napp V, Brown J, Hawe J, et al. The evaluate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328:129.
3. Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Toivonen J, Tiitinen A. Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study. Acta Obstet-Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:866-71.
4. Langebrekke A, Eraker R, Nesheim BI, Urnes A, Busund B, Sponland G. Abdominal hysterectomy should not be considered as a primary method for uterine removal. A prospective randomised study of 100 patients referred to hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:404-7.
5. Loh FH, Koa RC. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy: a controlled study of clinical and functional outcomes. Singapore Med J. 2002;43:403-7.
6. Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M. A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:345-50.
7. Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2996-9.
8. Seracchioli R, Venturoli S, Vianello F, Govoni F, Cantarelli M, Gualerzi B, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in the presence of a large uterus. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:333-8.
9. Sculpher M, Manca A, Abbott J, Fountain J, Mason S, Garry R. Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial. BMJ. 2004;328:134.
10. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630-41.
11. Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg. 1999;86:227-30.
12. Ladfors MB, Lofgren ME, Gabriel B, Olsson JH. Patient accept questionnaires integrated in clinical routine: a study by the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:437-42.
13. Lofgren M, Olsson J-H, Lindblom B, Nordensköld F. The national quality register of endoscopic gynecologic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75(Suppl. 165):55-222.
14. Donnez J, Nisolle M. Laparoscopic supracervical (subtotal) hysterectomy (LASH). J Gynecol Surg. 1993;9:91-4.
15. Nyström P-O. Svårt mäta resultat och kvalitet i kirurgi men vårdtiden är en viktig variabel. Läkartidningen. 2004;101:184-9.
16. Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322:473-6.
17. Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Billesbolle P, Hendel HW, et al. Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg. 2002;89:446-53.
18. Brodner G, Van Aken H, Hertle L, Fobker M, Von Eckardstein A, Goeters C, et al. Multimodal perioperative management - combining thoracic epidural analgesia, forced mobilization, and oral nutrition - reduces hormonal and metabolic stress and improves convalescence after major urologic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:1594-600.