Imperfect federalism: The intergovernmental partnership for homeland security

Public Administration Review

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 537-545

  Eisinger, Peter ^a  

^a NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745713137     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00614.x     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Behn, Robert, and Elizabeth Keating. 2004. Facing the Fiscal Crises in State Governments: National Problem, National Responsibilities. State Tax Notes, September 20, 833-47.
2. Congressional Research Service (CRS). 2003a. Homeland Security Advisory System: Possible Issues for Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
3. _. 2003b. Homeland Security: Standards for State and Local Preparedness. Washington, DC Library of Congress.
4. _. 2004a. Assistance to Firefighters Program. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
5. _. 2004b. First Responder Grant Formulas: The 9/11 Commission Recommendation and other Options for Congressional Action. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
6. _. 2004c. Fiscal Year 2005 Homeland Security Grant Program: State Allocations and Issues for Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
7. _. 2004d. FY 2003 and FY 2004 State Allocations for Selected Homeland Security Assistance Programs. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
8. Conlan, Timothy. 1998. From New Federalism to Devolution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). 2003. Emergency Responders: Drastically Underfunded, Dangerously Unprepared. Task Force Report No. 47. www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Responders_TF.pdf [accessed April 4, 20061
10. Dresang, Dennis. 2003. Strengthening Federal-State Relationships to Prevent and Respond to Terrorism, New York: Century Foundation.
11. Eisinger, Peter. 1998. City Politics in an Era of Federal Devolution. Urban Affairs Review 33(1): 308-25.
12. Greenblatt, Alan. 2004. The Left Behind Syndrome. Governing 17(12): 38-43.
13. Hoene, Christopher. 2003. Fiscal Crisis Trickles Down as States Cut Aid to Cities. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
14. Khademian, Anne. 2004. Strengthening State and Local Terrorism Prevention and Response. In The Department of Homeland Security's First Year Report Card, edited by Donald Kettl, 97-118. New York: Century Foundation.
15. Krane, Dale. 2002. The State of American Federalism, 2001-2002: Resilience in Response to Crisis. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 32(3): 1-21.
16. Lipton, Eric. 2005. Audit Faults U.S. for Its Spending on Port Defense. New York Times, February 20.
17. Murphy, Dean. 2004. Security Grants Still Streaming to Rural States. New York Times, October 12.
18. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks. 2004. The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attach Upon the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19. National Emergency Managers Association (NEMA). 2003. State Organisational Structures of Homeland Security. Washington, DC: National Emergency Managers Association.
20. Nivola, Pietro. 2002. Tense Commandments: Federal Prescriptions and City Problems. Washington, DC: Brooking: Institution Press.
21. Office of Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney. 2004. Buddy, Can You Spare a Dime? An Analysis of the Distribution of FIRE Act Grants. http://maloncy.house.gov/documents/olddocs/Sept11/FIRE_Act_Report.pdf [accessed April 4, 2006].
22. Peirce, Neal. 2003. Cities and Homeland Security Spending: As War Unfolds, What Now? Government Finance Review 19(2): 78-79.
23. Pionke, John. 2001. Officials Resolve to Secure Cities but Vow to Reassess Terrorism Plans. News release, September 24. www.nlc.org [accessed April 4, 2006].
24. Savitch, H. V. 2003. Does 9/11 Portend a New Paradigm for Cities? Urban Affairs Review 39(1): 103-27.
25. Sostek, Anya. 2003. Orange Crush. Governing 16(2): 18-23.
26. U.S. Conference of Mayors. 2002. The Heightened Cost of Security in America's Cities: A 192-City Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Conference of Mayors.
27. _. 2003. First Mayors' Report to the Nation: Tracking Federal Homeland Security Funds Sent to the 50 State Governments. A 168-City/50-State Survey. Washington, DC U.S. Conference of Mayors.
28. _. 2004a. Second Mayors' Report to the Nation: Tracking Federal Homeland Security Funds Sent to the 50 State Governments: A 215-City/50-State Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Conference of Mayors.
29. _. 2004b. Third Mayors' Report to the Nation: Tracking Homeland Security Funds Sent to the 50 State Governments: A 231-City/50-State Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Conference of Mayors.
30. _. 2005. Staff Analysis of the President's Fiscal Year 2006 Budget Request. Washington, DC: U.S. Conference of Mayors.
31. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). 2004. A Report from the Task Force on State and Local Homeland Security Funding. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2002. Combating Terrorism: Intergovernmental Cooperation in the Development of a National Strategy to Enhance State and Load Preparedness. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. GAO-02-550T
33. _. 2004. Emergency Preparedness: Federal Funds for First Responders. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. GAO-04-788T.
34. U.S. Congress. House. 2002. Homeland Security: Keeping First Responder First. Hearing before the Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs and International Relation. 107th Cong., 2nd sess., June 30.