Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 Through 2002. A review of the Finnish Arthroplasty Registry

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 88, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1425-1430

  Sheng, Pu Yi ^a   Konttinen, Liisa ^b   Lehto, Matti ^c   Ogino, Daisuke ^b   Jämsen, Esa ^c   Nevalainen, Juha ^d   Pajamäki, Jorma ^c   Halonen, Pekka ^c   Konttinen, Yrjö T ^e  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ORTON ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c COXA Hospital for Joint Replacement ^*  (Finland)

^d NATIONAL AGENCY FOR MEDICINES   (Finland)

^e HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF HELSINKI AND UUSIMAA   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING; HUMAN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PATELLA DISLOCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

EID: 33745713062     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00737     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Nevalainen J, Keinonen A, Mäkelä A, Pentti A. The 2002-2003 implant year-book on orthopaedic endoprostheses: Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Helsinki, Finland: National Agency for Medicines; 2003. www.nam.fi/uploads/ julkaisut/Orthopaedic_Endoprostheses_2003_v.pdf
2. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:259-65.
3. Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:1.
4. Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
5. Fox J. Cox proportional-hazards regression for survival data. Appendix to an R and S-PLUS companion to applied regression. cran.r-project.org/doc/ contrib/Fox-Companion/appendix-cox-regression.pdf. February 2002.
6. Pelz CJ, Klein JP. Analysis of survival data: a comparison of three major statistical packages (SAS, SPSS, BMDP). Medical College of Wisconsin. www.biostat.mcw.edu/tech/tr017.pdf. September 1996.
7. Nevalainen J, Hirvonen A, Pulkkinen P. A study of the outcome of arthroplasty surgery in Finland, commissioned by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Appendix to the 1998 implant yearbook on orthopaedic endoprostheses. Helsinki, Finland: National Agency for Medicines; 2000. www.nam.fi/uploads/ english/Publications/H-publ_3.2000.pdf
8. Sheng PY, Jämsen E, Lehto M, Konttinen YT, Pajamäki J, Halonen P. Revision total knee arthroplasty with Total Condylar III system in inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1222-4.
9. Sheng PY, Jämsen E, Lehto M, Pajamäki J, Halonen P, Konttinen YT. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the Total Condylar III system: a comparative analysis of 71 consecutive cases in patients with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis. Acta Orthop. In press.
10. Nevalainen J, Hirvonen A, Pulkkinen P. The 1996 implant yearbook on orthopaedic endoprostheses: Helsinki, Finland: National Agency for Medicines; 1997.