Paravertebral blockade with propofol sedation versus general anesthesia for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Vascular

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 17-22

  Falkensammer, Juergen ^a   Hakaim, Albert G ^a   Klocker, Josef ^a   Oldenburg, W Andrew ^a   Biebl, Matthias ^a   Lau, Louis L ^a   Neuhauser, Beate ^a   Mordecai, Monica ^a   Crawford, Claudia ^a   Greengrass, Roy ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; General anesthesia; Hemodynamic lability; Paravertebral blockade

Indexed keywords

CEFAZOLIN; DEXTROPROPOXYPHENE; DOLASETRON MESILATE; ERYTHROMYCIN; HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE PLUS PARACETAMOL; HYDROMORPHONE; MIDAZOLAM; MORPHINE; OPIATE; PROPOFOL; VANCOMYCIN;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SEDATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE BLOCK; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PROPOFOL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 33745712094     PISSN: 17085381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/6670.2006.00009     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Buth J, van Marrewijk O, Harris PL, Hop WC, Riambau V, Laheij RJ; EUROSTAR Collaborators. Outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with conditions considered unfit for an open procedure: a report on the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:211-21.
2. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, et al. EVAR Trial Participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:843-8.
3. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, et al. Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2004;351: 1607-18.
4. EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365:2187-92.
5. de Virgilio C, Romero L, Donayre C, et al. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with general versus local anesthesia: a comparison of cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality rates. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:988-91.
6. Bettex DA, Lachat M, Pfammatter T, et al. To compare general, epidural and local anaesthesia for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001;21:179-84.
7. Parra JR, Crabtree T, McLafferty RB, et al. Anesthesia technique and outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:123-9.
8. Borghi B, Casati A, Iuorio S, et al. Frequency of hypotension and bradycardia during general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, or integrated epidural-general anesthesia for total hip replacement. J Clin Anesth 2002;14:102-6.
9. Norris E, Beattie C, Perler B, et al. Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery. Anesthesiology 2001;95:1054-67.
10. Christopherson R, Beattie C, Frank SM, et al. Perioperative morbidity in patients randomized to epidural or general anesthesia for lower extremity vascular surgery. Anesthesiology 1993;79: 422-34.
11. Verhoeven EL, Cina CS, Tielliu IF, et al. Local anesthesia for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:402-9.
12. Weltz CR, Klein SM, Arbo JE, Greengrass RA. Paravertebral block anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg 2003;27: 425-9.
13. Coveney E, Weltz CR, Greengrass R, et al. Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in surgical management of breast cancer: experience in 156 cases. Ann Surg 1998;227:496-501.
14. Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, et al. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg 2000;90:1402-5.
15. Richardson J, Vowden P, Sabanathan S. Bilateral paravertebral analgesia for major abdominal vascular surgery: a preliminary report. Anaesthesia 1995;50:995-8.
16. Owens B, Felts J, Spitznagel E. ASA physical status classification: a study of consistency of ratings. Anaesthesiology 1978; 49:239-49.
17. Greengrass R, Buckenmaier CC III. Paravertebral anaesthesia/analgesia for ambulatory surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2002;16:271-83.
18. Gammaitoni AR, Fine P, Alvarez N, et al. Clinical application of opioid equianalgesic data. Clin J Pain 2003;19:286-97.
19. Richardson J, Sabanathan S, Jones J, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of preoperative and continuous balanced epidural or paravertebral bupivacaine on post-thoracotomy pain, pulmonary function and stress responses. Br J Anaesth 1999;83:387-92.
20. Candido KD. Post-dural puncture headache: pathophysiology, prevention and treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2003;17:451-69.
21. Naja Z, Ziade MF, Lonnqvist PA. Bilateral paravertebral somatic nerve block for ventral hernia repair. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 19:197-202.
22. Naja Z, Lonnqvist PA. Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade: incidence of failed block and complications. Anaesthesia 2001; 56:1184-8.