Comparing extremism propagation patterns in continuous opinion models

JASSS

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 29-52

  Deffuant, Guillaume ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Continuous Opinion; Convergence Pattern; Extremism

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745711705     PISSN: 14607425     EISSN: 14607425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AMBLARD F., and Deffuant, G. 2004. The role of network topology on extremism propagation with relative agreement opinion dynamics. Physica A. Vol 343 pp 725- 738
2. th, 1999, pp. 509-512.
3. DEFFUANT, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G. - 2001. Mixing beliefs among interacting agents, Advances in Complex Systems, 3, pp87- 98, 2001.
4. DEFFUANT, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G. and Faure, T. 2002. How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.5, 4. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/1.html
5. DEFFUANT, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G. 2004. "Modelling group opinion shift to extreme: the smooth bounded confidence model", Proceedings of the European Social Smulation Association Conference, Valladolid, September 2004.
6. DERRIDA, B. and H. Flyvbjerg, 1986. Multivalley structure in Kauffman's model: analogy with spin glasses J. Phys. A19, L1003-L1008.
7. EDMONDS, B., 2006, Assessing the Safety of (Numerical) Representation in Social Simulation, pp. 195-214 in: Agent- based computational modelling, edited by F.C. Billari, T. Fent, A. Prskawetz and J. Schefflarn, Physica Verlag, Heidelberg 2006.
8. GALAM, S. and Moscovici, S., 1991, Towards a theory of collective phenomena: consensus and attitude changes in groups. European Journal of Social Psychology. 21 49- 74.
9. HEGSELMANN, R. and Krause, U. 2002. Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models, Analysis and Simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.5, 3. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html
10. HEGSELMANN, R. and Krause, U. 2005. Opinion Dynamics Driven by Various Ways of Averaging. Computational Economics. Vol 25, Issue 4, Pages 381 - 405.
11. STAUFFER D., Sousa, A. Schulze C., 2004. Discretized Opinion Dynamics of The Deffuant Model on Scale- Free Networks. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol 7, 3. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/3/7.html
12. URBIG D. Attitude Dynamics With Limited Verbalisation Capabilities. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 6 no. 1, 2003. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/1/2.html
13. URBIG D. and Lorenz J., 2004. Communication regimes in opinion dynamics: Changing the number of communicating agents; Proceedings of the Second Conference of the European Social Simulation Association (ESSA), Valladolid, Spain, September 16-19.
14. WEISBUCH, G. Deffuant G., Amblard, F., Nadal J.P. 2002. Meet, Discuss and segregate!. Complexity, vol 7, issue 3, 55-63.
15. WEISBUCH, G. Deffuant G., Amblard. 2005. Persuasion dynamics. Physica A, vol 353 pp 555- 575.
16. YOUNG, P., 1998. Individual Strategy and social structure. Princeton University Press.