Contribution of tissue harmonic imaging and frequency compound imaging in interventional breast sonography

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 845-855

  Mesurolle, Benoît ^a,b   Bining, Harjinder J S ^a   Khoury, Mona El ^a   Barhdadi, Amina ^a   Kao, Ellen ^a  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast neoplasms, sonography; Breast, biopsy; Breast, sonography; Sonography, harmonic study

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY; HORMONES; IMAGE QUALITY; MEDICAL IMAGING; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

BREAST NEOPLASMS, DIAGNOSIS; BREAST NEOPLASMS, SONOGRAPHY; BREAST, BIOPSY; BREAST, SONOGRAPHY; SONOGRAPHY, HARMONIC STUDY;

TISSUE;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY COMPOUND IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 33745700784     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.7.845     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134.
2. Fornage BD. Sonographically guided needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 1999; 27:385-398.
3. Baker JA, Soo MS, Mengoni P. Sonographically guided percutaneous interventions of the breast using a steerable ultrasound beam. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:157-159.
4. Huber S, Wagner M, Medl M, Czembirek H. Real-time spatial compound imaging in breast ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:155-163.
5. Seo BK, Oh YW, Kim HR, et al. Sonographic evaluation of breast nodules: comparison of conventional, real-time compound, and pulse inversion harmonic images. Korean J Radiol 2002; 3:38-44.
6. Shapiro RS, Simpson WL, Rausch DL, Yeh H-C. Compound spatial sonography of the thyroid gland: evaluation of freedom from artifacts and of nodule conspicuity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1195-1198.
7. Strobel K, Zanetti M, Nagy L, Hodler J. Suspected rotator cuff lesions: tissue harmonic imaging versus conventional US of the shoulder. Radiology 2004; 230:243-249.
8. Desser TS, Jeffrey RB. Tissue harmonic imaging techniques: physical principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001; 22:1-10.
9. Cohnen M, Saleh A, Luthen R, Bode J, Modder U. Improvement of sonographic needle visibility in cirrhotic livers during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt procedures with use of real-time compound imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:103-106.
10. Saleh A, Ernst S, Grust A, Furst G, Dall P, Modder U. Real-time compound imaging: improved visibility of puncture needles and localization wires as compared to single-line ultrasonography [in German]. Rofo 2001; 173:368-372.
11. Jung EM, Clevert D-A, Lutz R, Kett H, Rupp N. Preoperative wire localization of breast lesions by tissue harmonic imaging sonography. Rofo 2002; 174:1121-1125.
12. Venta LA, Dudiak CM, Salomon CG, Flisak ME. Sonographic evaluation of the breast. Radiographics 1994; 14:29-50.
13. Bradley MJ. An in-vitro study to understand successful free-hand ultrasound guided intervention. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:495-498.
14. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.
15. Choudhry S, Gorman B, Charboneau JW, et al. Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal disease. Radiographics 2000; 20:1127-1135.
16. Jespersen SK, Wilhjelm JE, Sillesen H. Multiangle compound imaging. Ultrason Imaging 1998; 20:81-102.
17. Browne JE, Watson AJ, Gibson NM, Dudley NJ, Elliott AT. Objective measurements of image quality. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30:229-237.
18. Gatenby JC, Hoddinott JC, Leeman S. Phasing out speckle. Phys Med Biol 1989; 34:1683-1689.
19. Rosen EL, Soo MS. Tissue harmonic imaging of breast lesions improved margin analysis, conspicuity, and image quality compared to conventional ultrasound. Clin Imaging 2001; 25:379-384.
20. Bisceglia M, Matalon TA, Silver B. The pump maneuver: an atraumatic adjunct to enhance US needle tip localization. Radiology 1990; 176:867-868.
21. Laine HR, Rainio J. An inexpensive method of improving visualisation of the needle tip in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Ann Chir Gynaecol 1993; 82:43-45.
22. Hopkins RE, Bradley M. In-vitro visualization of biopsy needles with ultrasound: a comparative study of standard and echogenic needles using an ultrasound phantom. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:499-502.
23. Bondestam S, Kreula KJ. Needle tip echogenicity: a study with real time ultrasound. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:555-560.
24. Cheung S, Rohling R. Enhancement of needle visibility in ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedures. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30:617-624.
25. Karstrup S, Brons J, Morsel L, Juul N, von der Recke P. Optimal set-up for ultrasound guided punctures using new scanner applications: an in-vitro study. Eur J Ultrasound 2002; 15:77-84.
26. Tranquart F, Grenier N, Eder V, Pourcelot L. Clinical use of ultrasound tissue harmonic imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25:889-894.
27. Entrekin RR, Porter BA, Sillesen HH, Wong AD, Cooperberg PL, Fix CH. Real-time spatial compound imaging: application to breast, vascular, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001; 22:50-64.
28. Malich A, Marx C, Sauner D. Assessment of conventional versus real-time spatial compound imaging in breast sonography: preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound 2003; 31:59-60.
29. Pedersen MH, Misaridis TX, Jensen JA. Clinical evaluation of chirp-coded excitation in medical ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29:895-905.
30. Jang HJ, Lim HK, Lee WJ, Kim SH, Kim KA, Kim EY. Ultrasonographic evaluation of focal hepatic lesions: comparison of pulse inversion harmonic, tissue harmonic, and conventional imaging techniques. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19:293-299.