Passive catheter visualization in magnetic resonance-guided endovascular therapy using multicycle projection dephasers

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 160-167

  Draper, Jonathan N ^a,b   Lauzon, M Louis ^a,b   Frayne, Richard ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Background suppression; Endovascular therapy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Passive catheter tracking; Projection dephaser

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DOG; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FLUOROSCOPY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION;

ANIMALS; BLOOD VESSELS; CATHETERIZATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; DOGS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 33745700349     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20619     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, et al. Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1992;77:515-524.
2. Diethrich EB, Ndiaye M, Reid DB. Stenting in the carotid artery: initial experience in 110 patients. J Endovasc Surg 1996;3:42-62.
3. Phatouros CC, Higashida RT, Malek AM, et al. Carotid artery stent placement for atherosclerotic disease: rationale, technique, and current status. Radiology 2000;217:26-41.
4. Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, et al. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:109-137.
5. Pettersen JA, Hudon ME, Hill MD. Intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a review of pharmacologic approaches. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2004;2:285-299.
6. Strother CM. The rapidly expanding role of MR imaging techniques in the endovascular treatment of CNS diseases. Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:4-5.
7. Harris AD, Ryder RC, Hudon ME, et al. A canine model of ischemic stroke for MR-guided endovascular therapy. In: Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of ASNR, San Diego, CA, USA, April 29-May 5, 2006.
8. Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Darrow RD. Real-time position monitoring of invasive devices using magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:411-415.
9. Rasche V, Holz D, Kohler J, Proksa R, Roschmann P. Catheter tracking using continuous radial MRI. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:963-968.
10. Glowinski A, Adam G, Bucker A, Neuerburg J, van Vaals JJ, Gunther RW. Catheter visualization using locally induced, actively controlled field inhomogeneities. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:253-258.
11. Zimmermann-Paul GG, Ladd ME, Pfammatter T, Hilfiker PR, Quick HH, Debatin JF. MR versus fluoroscopic guidance of a catheter/guidewire system: in vitro comparison of steerability. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1177-1181.
12. Wildermuth S, Dumoulin CL, Pfammatter T, Maier SE, Hofmann E, Debatin JF. MR-guided percutaneous angioplasty: assessment of tracking safety, catheter handling and functionality. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 1998;21:404-410.
13. Bakker CJ, Hoogeveen RM, Weber J, van Vaals JJ, Viergever MA, Mali WP. Visualization of dedicated catheters using fast scanning techniques with potential for MR-guided vascular interventions. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:816-820.
14. Bakker CJ, Hoogeveen RM, Hurtak WF, van Vaals JJ, Viergever MA, Mali WP. MR-guided endovascular interventions: susceptibility-based catheter and near-real-time imaging technique. Radiology 1997;202:273-276.
15. Unal O, Korosec FR, Frayne R, Strother CM, Mistretta CA. A rapid 2D time-resolved variable-rate k-space sampling MR technique for passive catheter tracking during endovascular procedures. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:356-362.
16. Green JD, Omary RA, Finn JP, et al. Passive catheter tracking using MRI: Comparison of conventional and magnetization-prepared FLASH. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:104-109.
17. Bos C, Bakker CJG, Viergever MA. Background suppression using magnetization preparation for contrast-enhanced MR projection angiography. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:78-87.
18. Nagarajappa N, Sabati M, Zhu H, Frayne R. Realistic heterogeneous tissue model for evaluating background suppression techniques in endovascular magnetic resonance. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of CMBES, Quebec City, PQ, Canada, September 8-11, 2004.
19. Dixon WT, Du LN, Faul DD, Gado M, Rossnick S. Projection angiograms of blood labeled by adiabatic fast passage. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:454-462.
20. Skuldt DH, Unal O, Frayne R. Catheter visualization with projection dephaser gradients. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1999. (Abstract 1949).
21. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999. p 466-468.
22. Frayne R, Omary RA, Unal O, Strother CM. Determination of optimal injection parameters for intra-arterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:1277-1284.
23. Jiang XQ, Yu H, Frayne R, Unal O, Strother CM. Novel magnetic resonance signal enhancing coating material. Adv Mater 2001;13:490-493.
24. Kraitchman DL, Gilson WD, Karmarkar PV, Stuber M. Making MR-invisible devices visible for vascular interventional MRI. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Miami Beach, FL, USA, 2005. (Abstract 2165).
25. Seppenwoolde J-H, Viergever MA, Bakker CJG. Passive tracking exploiting local signal conservation: The white marker phenomenon. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:784-790.
26. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-351.
27. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.