Development of real-time visual feedback assistance in singing training: A review

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 308-316

  Hoppe, D ^a   Sadakata, M ^a   Desain, P ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Real time visual feedback; Review; Singing education

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745699039     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00178.x     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Arends N. & Povel DJ. (1991) An evaluation of the visual speech apparatus. Speech communication 10, 405-414.
2. Callaghan J., Thorpe W. & Van Doom J. (2004) The science of singing and seeing. Proceedings of the Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (CIM04), Graz, Australia, April 15-18.
3. Dowd A., Smith J. & Wolfe J. (1998) Learning to pronounce vowel sounds in a foreign language using acoustic measurements of the vocal tract as feedback in real-time. Language and Speech 41, 1-20.
4. Hirata Y. (2004) Computer assisted pronunciation training for native English speakers learning Japanese pitch and duration contrasts. Computer Assisted Language Learning 17, 357-376.
5. Howard D.M. & Welch G.F. (1989) Microcomputer-based singing ability assessment and development. Applied Acoustics 27, 89-102.
6. Howard D.M. & Welch G.F. (1993) Visual displays for the assessment of vocal pitch matching development. Applied Acoustics 39, 235-252.
7. Howard D.M., Welch G.F., Brereton J. & Himonides E. (2003) Towards a novel real-time visual display for singing training, http://www.sonustech.com/voxed.
8. Howard D.M., Welch G.F., Brereton J., Himonides E., DeCosta M., Williams J. & Howard A.W. (2004) WinSingad: a real-time display for the singing studio. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 29, 135-144.
9. Latane B., Williams K. & Harkins S. (1979) Many hands make light the work: the cause and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 822-832.
10. Neri A., Cucchiarini C., Strik H. & Boves L. (2002) The pedagogy-technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15, 441-467.
11. Rossiter D. & Howard D.M. (1996) ALBERT: real-time visual feedback computer tool for professional vocal development. Journal of Voice 10, 321-336.
12. Rossiter D., Howard D.M. & DeCosta M. (1996) Voice development under training with and without the influence of real-time visually presented biofeedback. Acoustical Society of America 99, 3253-3256.
13. Welch G.F. (1985) A schema theory of how children learn to sing in tune. Psychology of Music 13, 3-18.
14. Welch G.F., Rush C. & Howard D.M. (1989) Real-time visual feedback in the development of vocal pitch accuracy in singing. Psychology of Music 17, 146-157.
15. Welch G.F., Himonides E., Howard D.M. & Brereton J. (2004) VOXed: Technology as a meaningful teaching aid in the singing studio. Proceedings of the conference on interdisciplinary musicology (CIM04), Graz, Australia, April 15-18.
16. Welch G.F., Howard D.M., Himonides E. & Brereton J. (2005) Real-time feedback in the singing studio: an innovatory action-research project using new voice technology. Music Education Research 7, 225-249.
17. Wilson P.H., Thorpe C.W. & Callaghan J. (2005) Looking at singing: does real-time visual feedback improve the way we learn to sing? Second APSCOM Conference: Asia-Pacific Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, South Korea, Seoul, August 4-6.
18. Wulf G. & Prinz W. (2001) Directing attentionto movements effects enhances learning: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8, 648-660.