Roe versus reality - Abortion and women's health

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 355, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Wright, Alexi A ^a   Katz, Ingrid T ^b  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; ONCOGENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ABORTION, LEGAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 33745698692     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp068083     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003;35:6-15.
2. Uttley L, Pawelko R. No strings attached: public funding of religiously sponsored hospitals in the United States. Albany, N.Y.: MergerWatch, 2002.
3. Index. Harper's Magazine, April 2006 (data from HeartBeat International and Stanley Henshaw, AGI). (Accessed June 15, 2006, at http://www.harpers.org/ HarpersIndex2006-04.html.)
4. Beral V, Bull D, Peto R, Reeves G. Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83,000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet 2004;363:1007-16.
5. Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE. Psychological responses after abortion. Science 1990;248:41-4.