Adjustments to the correction for attenuation

Psychological Methods

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 207-215

  Wetcher Hendricks, Debra ^a  

^a MORAVIAN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Correction for attenuation; Error score; Part correlation; Partial correlation; Spearman

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BASEBALL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; SUNLIGHT; TEMPERATURE; WEATHER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BASEBALL; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS; SUNLIGHT; TEMPERATURE; WEATHER;

EID: 33745686563     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.207     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Allen, M.J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Montercy, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2. Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3. Charles, H. (2005). The correction for attenuation due to measurement error: Clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets. Psychological Methods, 10, 206-226.
4. Hakstian, A. R., Schroeder, M. L., & Rogers, W. T. (1988). Inferential procedures for the con-elation coefficients corrected for attenuation. Psychometrika, 53, 27-43.
5. Reddy, S. K. (1992). Effects of ignoring correlated measurement error in structural equation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 549-570.
6. Rogers, W. T. (1976). Jackknifing disattenuated correlations. Psychometrika, 4L 121-133.
7. Scott, Z. (2001, February 21). Season in review: New York Mets. Retrieved December 21, 2005, from http://espn.go.com/mlb/ 2001/0221/1099814.html
8. Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72-101.
9. UMass Cranberry Station. (2005). UMass Cranberry Station weather summary. Retrieved June 24, 2005, from http://www .umass.edu/cranberry/services/
10. Winne, P. H., & Belfry, M. J. (1982). Interpretive problems when correcting for attenuation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 125-134.
11. Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1965). Chance success due to guessing and non-independence of true score and error scores in multiple choice tests: Computer trials with prepared distributions. Psychological Reports, 17, 159-165.
12. Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1977). The theory of test validity and correlated errors of measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 16, 135-152.