Local and global uncertainty analysis of complex chemical kinetic systems

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 91, Issue 10-11, 2006, Pages 1232-1240

  Zador J ^a   Zsely I Gy ^a   Turanyi T ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Atmospheric chemistry; Combustion modelling; Local uncertainty analysis; Mechanism validation; Monte Carlo method; Morris method

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; COMBUSTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CHEMICAL KINETIC SYSTEM; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; LOCAL UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; MORRIS METHOD;

REACTION KINETICS;

EID: 33745685274     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.020     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. In: Saltelli A., Scott E.M., and Chen K. (Eds). Sensitivity analysis (2000), Wiley, Chichester
2. Turányi T. Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems-tools and applications. J Math Chem 5 3 (1990) 203-248
3. Turányi T., Zalotai L., Dóbé S., and Bérces T. Effect of the uncertainty of kinetic and thermodynamic data on methane flame simulation results. Phys Chem Chem Phys 4 12 (2002) 2568-2578
4. Morris M.D. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33 (1991) 161-174
5. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Campolongo F., and Ratto M. Sensitivity analysis in practice: a guide to assessing scientific models (2004), Wiley, Chicester
6. Helton JC, Davis FJ. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. SAND2001-0417, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2002.
7. Atkinson R., Baulch D.L., Cox R.A., Crowley J.N., Hampson R.F.J., Kerr J.A., et al. Summary of evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry (Web version). J Phys Chem Ref Data (2002)
8. Sander SP, Golden DM, Kurylo MJ, Moortgat GK, Ravishankara AR, Kolb CE, et al. Chemical kinetics and photochemical data for use in atmospheric studies. Evaluation No. 14, 2003.
9. Baulch D.L., Cobos C.J., Cox R.A., Frank P., Hayman G.D., Just T., et al. Evaluated kinetic data for combustion modeling (vol 23, pg 847, 1994). J Phys Chem Ref Data 24 4 (1995) 1609-1630
10. Burcat A. Ideal gas thermochemical database, 2001. ftp://ftp.technion.ac.il/pub/supported/aetdd/thermodynamics.
11. Saunders S.M., Jenkin M.E., Derwent R.G., and Pilling M.J. Protocol for the development of the master chemical mechanism, MCM v3 (part a): tropospheric degradation of non-aromatic volatile organic compounds. Atmos Chem Phys 3 (2003) 161-180
12. Zádor J., Wagner V., Wirtz K., and Pilling M.J. Quantitative assessment of uncertainties for a model of tropospheric ethene oxidation using the European photochemical reactor. Atmos Environ 39 (2005) 2805-2817
13. Curtis AR, Sweetenham WP. Facsimile/checkmat user's manual. Computer Science and Sytems Division, Harwell Laboratories, Oxfordshire, 1987.
14. Warnatz J. Resolution of gas phase and surface combustion chemistry into elementary reactions. Proc Combust Inst 24 (1992) 553-579
15. Bromly J.H., Barnes F.J., Muris S., You X., and Haynes B.S. Kinetic and thermodynamic sensitivity analysis of the NO-sensitised oxidation of methane. Combust Sci Technol 115 4-6 (1996) 259-296
16. Brown M.J., Smith D.B., and Taylor S.C. Influence of uncertainties in rate constants on computed burning velocities. Combust Flame 117 3 (1999) 652-656
17. Phenix B.D., Dinaro J.L., Tatang M.A., Tester J.W., Howard J.B., and McRae G.J. Incorporation of parametric uncertainty into complex kinetic mechanisms: application to hydrogen oxidation in supercritical water. Combust Flame 112 1-2 (1998) 132-146
18. Reagan M.T., Najm H.M., Ghanem R.G., and Knio O.M. Uncertainty quantification in reacting-flow simulations through non-intrusive spectral projection. Combust Flame 132 3 (2003) 545-555
19. Tomlin SA. The evaluation of combustion mechanisms using local and global sensitivity and uncertainty methods. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2004, this issue.
20. Scire J.J., Dryer F.L., and Yetter R.A. Comparison of global and local sensitivity techniques for rate constants determined using complex reaction mechanisms. Int J Chem Kinet 33 (2001) 784-802
21. Combustion simulations at the Leeds University and at the ELTE. http://www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/Combustion/Combustion.html, http://garfield.chem.elte.hu/Combustion/Combustion.html.
22. Hughes K.J., Turányi T., Clague A.R., and Pilling M.J. Development and testing of a comprehensive chemical mechanism for the oxidation of methane. Int J Chem Kinet 33 9 (2001) 513-538
23. Glassmann I. Combustion (1996), Academic, San Diego
24. Kee RJ, Grcar JF, Smooke MD, Miller JA. A FORTRAN program for modeling steady laminar one-dimensional premixed flames. SAND85-8240, Sandia National Laboratories, 1985.
25. Kee RJ, Rupley FM, Miller JA. Chemkin-II: A FORTRAN chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics. SAND89-8009B, Sandia National Laboratories, 1989.
26. El Bakali A., Dagaut P., Pillier L., Desgroux P., Pauwels J- F., Rida A., et al. Experimental and modeling study of the oxidation of natural gas in a premixed flame, shock tube, and jet-stirred reactor. Combust. Flame 137 (2004) 109-128
27. Turbiez A., El Bakali A., Pauwels J.F., Ridab A., and Meunier P. Experimental study of a low pressure stoichiometric premixed methane, methane/ethane, methane/ethane/propane and synthetic natural gas flames. Fuel 83 (2004) 933-941
28. Bosschaart KJ. Analysis of the heat flux method for measuring burning velocities. Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 2002.
29. Bosschaart K.J., and de Goey L.P.H. Detailed analysis of the heat flux method for measuring burning velocities. Combust Flame 132 (2003) 170-180