Educating diabetic patients about insulin use: Changes over time in certainty and correctness of knowledge

Diabetes and Metabolism

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 256-261

  Bruttomesso, D ^a,c   Costa, S ^a   Dal Pos, M ^a   Crazzolara, D ^a   Realdi, G ^a   Tiengo, A ^a   Baritussio, A ^a   Gagnayre, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Certainty and correctness of knowledge; Insulin use; Patient education; Type 1 diabetes

Indexed keywords

INSULIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIABETIC PATIENT; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; THEORY;

EID: 33745678935     PISSN: 12623636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70277-X     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial research group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-86.
2. The DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy. N Engl J Med 2000;342:381-89.
3. Tardif J. Pour un enseignement stratégique : l'apport de la psychologie cognitive. Montréal, Canada : Les Éditions Logiques, 1992, p. 48-50.
4. Anderson JR. The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983, p. 215-60.
5. Shuford E, Albert A, Massengil NE. Admissible probability measurement procedures. Psychometrika 1966;31:125-45.
6. De Finetti B. Logical foundations and measurement of subjective probability. Acta Psychol 1970;34:129-45.
7. Jans V, Leclercq D. Metacognitive realism: a cognitive style or a learning strategy? Educational Psychology 1997;17:101-10.
8. Khan KS, Gupta DJ. Formative self-assessment using multiple true-false questions on the Internet: feedback according to confidence about correct knowledge. Med Teach 2001;23:158-63.
9. Hunt D. Human Self-Assessment. Theory and application to learning and testing. In: Leclercq D, Bruno J, eds. Item Banking: self-assessment and interactive testing. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1993, p. 177-89.
10. Bruttomesso D, Gagnayre R, Leclercq D, et al. The use of degrees of certainty to evaluate knowledge. Patient Educ Couns 2003;51:29-37.
11. Patel VK. Biomedical knowledge and clinical reasoning. In: Evans DA ed. Cognitive Science in Medicine: Biomedical Modeling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989, p. 53-108.
12. Smith SM. A comparison of two techniques for reducing context-depending forgetting. Mem Cognit 1984;12:477-82.
13. Leclercq D, Conti C, De Ketele JM, et al. Diagnostic cognitif et métacognitif au seuil de l'université. Liège : Les Éditions de l'Université de Liège, 2003, p. 1-312.
14. Derry SJ. Learning strategies tor acquiring useful knowledge. In: Jones BF, Idol L eds. Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1990, 347-80.
15. Hanson CL, De Guire MJ, Schinkel AM, Kolterman OG. Empirical validation for a family-centered model of care. Diabetes Care 1995;18:1347-56.
16. Réach G, Zerrouki A, Leclercq D, d'Ivernois JF. Adjusting insulin doses: from knowledge to decision. Patient Educ Couns 2005;56: 98-103.
17. Anderson MC, Ochsner KN, Kuhl B, et al. Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science 2004;303:232-5.