Optimization of piezoelectric sensor location for delamination detection in composite laminates

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 511-528

  Swann, Cynthia ^a   Chattopadhyay, Aditi ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Composite plate; Damage detection; Genetic algorithm; Monte Carlo technique; Sensor placement

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE MATERIALS; DELAMINATION; LAMINATES; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY; SENSORS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

COMPOSITE PLATE; DAMAGE DETECTION; DISTRIBUTED PIEZOELECTRIC SENSORS; LAMINATED COMPOSITE STRUCTURES; MONTE CARLO TECHNIQUE;

PIEZOELECTRIC DEVICES;

EID: 33745676127     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03052150600557841     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abdullah, M., Richardson, A. and Hanif, J., Placement of sensors/actuators on civil structures using genetic algorithms. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 2001, 30, 1167-1184.
2. Blanas, P., Wenger, M.P., Shuford, R.J. and Dasgupta, D.K., Active composite materials and damage monitoring, in International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, 1997, pp. 199-207.
3. Chun, S., Kim, Y. and Kapania, R., Genetic algorithms for inverse problems in optical imaging, in International Conference on Computational Engineering and Sciences, 2002.
4. Coverley, P.T. and Staszewski, W.J., Impact damage location in composite structures using optimized sensor triangulation procedure. Smart Mater. Struct., 2003, 12, 795-803.
5. Friswell, M.I., Penny, J.E.T. and Garvey, S.D., A combined genetic and eigensensitivity algorithm for the location of damage in structures. Comput. Struct., 1998, 69(5), 547-556.
6. Fukunaga, H., Hu, N. and Chang, F.K., Structural damage identification using piezoelectric sensors. Int. J. Solids Struct., 2002, 39, 393-418.
7. Halin, D. and Maheimani, S., An optimization approach to optimal placement of collocated piezoelecetric actuators and sensors on a thin plate. Mechatronics, 2003, 13(1), 27-47.
8. Heo, G., Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge. Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 1997, 16(7-8), 495-502.
9. Hill, R., A Monte Carlo study of genetic algorithm initial population generation methods, in 31st Winter Simulation Conference. Simulation: A Bridge to the Future, 1999, pp. 543-547.
10. Kammer, D.C., Efficient sensor placement for on-orbit, modal identification of sequentially assembled large space structures. Int. J. Analyt. Exp. Modal Anal., 1992, 7(2), 95-109.
11. Keilers, C.H. and Chang, F.K., Identifying delamination in composite beams using built-in piezoelectrics. Part I: Experiments and analysis. Part II: An identification method. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 1995, 5(5), 649-653.
12. Kim, H.S., Chattopadhyay, A. and Ghoshal, A., Characterization of delamination effect on composite laminates using a new generalized layerwise approach. Comput. Struct., 2003a, 81(15), 1555-1566.
13. Kim, H.S., Chattopadhyay, A. and Ghoshal, A., Dynamic analysis of composite structures with multiple delamination using improved layerwise theory. AIAA J., 2003b, 41(9), 1771-1779.
14. Lim, K.B., Method for optimal actuator and sensor placement for large flexible structures. J. Guid. Control Dynam., 1992, 15(1), 49-57.
15. Maghami, P.G. and Johi, S.M., Sensor/actuator placement for flexible space structures. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Syst., 1993, 29(2), 345-351.
16. Manno, I. Introduction to the Monte-Carlo Method, 1999 (Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest).
17. Miller, I., Freund, J. and Johnson, R., Probability and Statistics for Engineers (6th edn), 2000 (Prentice Hall: New Jersey).
18. Ostachowicz, W., Krawczuk, M. and Cartmell, M., Genetic algorithms in health monitoring of structures, in International Conference on Structural Control and Health Monitoring, SMART 2001, pp. 1-11.
19. Raich, A.M. and Liszkai, T.R., Multi-objective genetic algorithm methodology for optimizing sensor layouts to enhance structural damage detection, in 4th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, 2003, pp. 650-657.
20. Ratnam, C. and Rao, P., Identification of damage in structures using genetic algorithms. J. Inst. Eng. (India), 2004, 84, 154-160.
21. Rusk, D., Lin, K., Swartz, D. and Ridgeway, G., Bayesian updating of damage size probabilities for aircraft structural life-cycle management, in 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2001.
22. Staszewski, W. and Worden, K., An overview of optimal sensor location methods for damage detection, in 8th Annual SPIE International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, 2001, pp. 4326-4377.
23. Sundaresan, M., Ghoshal, A. and Schulz, M., A continuous sensor for damage detection in bars. Smart Mater. Struct., 2002, 11, 475-488.
24. Swann, C. and Chattopadhyay, A., Optimal sensor placement for damage characterization using genetic algorithms, in 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2004.
25. Swann, C., Chattopadhyay, A. and Ghoshal, A., Characterization of delamination in using strain-based damage indices. J. Reinf. Plas. Comp., 2005, 24(7), 699-711.
26. Udwadia, F., Methodology for optimum sensor locations for parameter identification in dynamic systems. J. Eng. Mech., 1994, 120(2), 268-390.
27. Weibull, W., A statistical distribution of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech., 1951, 293-297.