The efficacy of spinosad on different strains of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Turkish Journal of Biology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 5-9

  Aydin, Hilal ^a   Gürkan, M Oktay ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Biological Activity; Spinosad; Spodoptera littoralis; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

ALABAMA ARGILLACEA; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; LEPIDOPTERA; NOCTUIDAE; SPODOPTERA LITTORALIS;

EID: 33745675936     PISSN: 13000152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Gurkan O. www.rothamsted-international.org/HTML/Publications/ Posters/OktayGurkan.pdf, 2004.
2. Bond JG, Marina CF, Williams T. The naturally derived insecticide spinosad is highly toxic to Aedes and Anopheles mosquito larvae. Med Vet Entomol. 18: 50-56, 2004.
3. Mertz PP, Yao RC. Saccharopolyspora spinosa sp nov isolated from soil collected in a sugar rum still. Inter J Sustain Bacteri. 40: 34-39, 1990.
4. Wyss CF, Young HP, Shukla J et al. Biology and genetics of a laboratory strain of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), highly resistant to spinosad. Crop Protection. 22: 307-314, 2003.
5. Salgado VL, Sheets JJ, Watson GB et al. Studies on the mode of action of spinosad: the internal effective concentration and the concentration dependence of neural excitation. Pestic Biochem Physiol 60: 103-110, 1998.
6. Salgado VL. The modes of action of Spinosad - a other insect control products. Down to Earth 52: 35-43, 1997.
7. Thompson GD, Dutton R, Sparks TC. Spinosad - a case study: an example from a natural products discovery programme. Pest Manag Sci 56: 696-702, 2000.
8. Aydin H. Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lep: Noctuidae)'e karşi bazi Tanacetum spp. (Compositae) ekstraktlarinin biyolojik aktivitelerinin belirlenmesi, MSc, Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2002.
9. LeOra Software. 1987. POLO-PC a user's guide to probit or logit analysis, LeOra Software, Berkeley, 22 pp.
10. Abbott WS. A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18: 265-267, 1925.
11. nd WHO Monographs Ser. 38. World Health Organisation, 1971.
12. Ahmad M, Arif MI, Ahmad Z. Susceptibility of Heliothis armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) new chemistries in Pakistan. Crop Protection. 22: 539-544, 2003.
13. Young HP, Bailey WD, Roe RM. Spinosad selection of a laboratory strain of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and characterization of resistance. Crop Protection. 22: 265-273, 2003.
14. Huang F, Subramanyam B, Toews MD. Susceptibility of laboratory and field strains of four stored-product insect species to spinosad. J Econ Entomol. 97: 2154-2159, 2004.
15. Flinn PW, Subramanyam B, Arthur FH. Comparison of aeration and spinosad for suppressing insects in stored wheat. J Econ Entomol 97: 1465-1473, 2004.
16. Toews MD, Subramanyam B, Rowan JM. Knockdown and mortality of adults of eight species of stored-product beetles exposed to four surfaces treated with spinosad. J Econ Entomol 96: 1967-1973, 2003.
17. Kristensen M, Jespersen JB. Susceptibility of spinosad in Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) field populations. J Econ Entomol 97: 1042-1408, 2004.
18. Pineda S, Budia F, Schneider MI et al. Effects of two biorational insecticides, spinosad and methoxyfenozide, on Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under laboratory conditions. J Econ Entomol 97: 1906-1911, 2004.
19. Stark JD, Vargas R, Miller N. Toxicity of spinosad in protein bait to three economically important tephritid fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J Econ Entomol 97: 911-915, 2004.