Simulation model for the study of overhead rail current collector systems dynamics, focused on the design of a new conductor rail

Vehicle System Dynamics

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 595-614

  Vera, C ^a   Suarez, B ^b   Paulin, J ^b   Rodriguez P ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b ETS Ingenieros de Telecomunicacion   (Spain)

Author keywords

Catenary; New design; Optimization; Overhead conductor rail; Pantograph

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; DYNAMICS; INSTALLATION; SUBWAYS;

CATENARY; NEW DESIGN; OVERHEAD CONDUCTOR RAIL; PANTOGRAPH;

RAILS;

EID: 33745664258     PISSN: 00423114     EISSN: 17445159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00423110500165499     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hérault, J.C., 1993, La caténaire rigide: Quel intérêt? Quel avenir? RATP Savoir-Faire, 5, 31-37.
2. Furrer+Frey, The conductor railian alternative to the convertional contact line. Available online at: http://www.furrerfrey.ch/en/products2.html (accessed May 2004).
3. Montesinos, J. and Machado, M., 1998, Características generales del sistema de Catenaria Rígida (STOL, Informe Técnico).
4. KLK Electro Materiales, S.A., Rigid catenary for railways overhead electric line "Klk-Catrig" Availble online at: http://www.klk.es/home/ ing/catenaria_rigida (accessed May 2004).
5. Poetsch, G., Evans, J., Meisinger, R., Kortüm, W., Baldauf, W., Veitl, A. and Wallaschek, J., 1997, Pantograph/catenary dynamics control. Vehicle System Dynamics, 28, 159-195.
6. Lamon, J.P., 2001, La qualité de captage pantographe/ caténaire. Revue Générale des Chemins de Fer, 4, April.
7. García de Jalon, J., 1982, Estudio Dinaḿico a Velocidades Elevadas de la Catenaria Tipo RENFE Modernizada y Compensada. Proyecto de investigaciön de la Escuela Superior de Ingenieros Industriales de la Universidad de Navarra.
8. Fernández, J.A. and Pastor, M., 1998, Análisis mediante elementos finitos del acoplamiento dińdmico catenariapantógiafo. CEDEX (Centro de Estudios y Experimentatión de Obras Públicas).
9. EN 50318, 2002, Validation of simulation of the dynamic interaction between pantogiaphs and overhead contact line, CENELEC.
10. prEN 50367, 2002, Technical criteria for the inteiaction between pantograph and overhead contact line, CENELEC.
11. UIC 79-1: Pantograph/overhead line iteration for DC-electrified railway lines, UCI, August 2001.
12. Simeon, B. and Arnold, M., 2000, Coupling DAE's and PDE's for simulating the interaction of pantograph and catenary. Math and Computer Model of Systems, 6, 129-144.
13. Jensen, C.N., 1997, Nonlinear Systems with Discrete and Continuous Elements. PhD thesis, ATV Industrial (ATV 551).
14. Norma técnica No 484-Descripción, mantenimiento y prescripciones de pruebas del pantógrafo (AM 37 EU-5. Metro de Madrid).
15. Arriola, I. and Ciordia, R., 1981, Pantógmfos de Alta Velocidad y de Alta Intensidad de Captación (ADAF, Cuaderno Técnico no. 1).
16. Patent no. EP1484214, 2004, Profile for Supporting the Contact Wire in a Rigid Overhead Railway Electrification System. Metro de Madrid, December.