Refusing alternatives: A science of contestation

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 130-139

  St Pierre, Adams Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Institute of Education Sciences; No Child Left Behind Act; Postmodern; Scientific based research

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745663952     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800403259494     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
2. Butler, J. (1987). Subjects of desire: Hegelian reflections in twentieth-century France. New York: Columbia University Press.
3. Butler, J. (1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of "postmodernism". In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 3-21). New York: Routledge.
4. Butler, J. (1995). For a careful reading. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 127-143). New York: Routledge.
5. Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international (P. Kamuf, Trans.). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1993)
6. Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002a). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4-14.
7. Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002b). Reply. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 28-29.
8. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon. (Original work published 1971)
9. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
10. Foucault, M. (1997). The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom (H. Becker, R. Fornet-Betancourt, & A. Gomez-Müller, Interviewers; P. Aranov & D. McGrawth, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 281-301). New York: New Press. (Original work published 1984)
11. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12. Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/offices/IES
13. Keenan, T. (1997). Fables of responsibility: Aberrations and predicaments in ethics and politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. LeFort, C. (1988). The question of democracy. In Democracy and political theory (D. Macey, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1986)
15. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education (R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne, Eds., Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
17. Spivak, G. C. (1993a). An interview with Gayatri Spivak (S. Danius & S. Jonsson, Interviewers). Boundary 2, 29(2), 24-50.
18. Spivak, G. C. (1993b). Outside in the teaching machine. New York: Routledge.
19. St. Pierre, E. A. (2002). "Science" rejects postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 25-27.
20. U.S. Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (2001). CFDA No. 84.30H. Federal Register Online, 66 (246). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/announcements/ 2001-4/122101c.html
21. U.S. Department of Education. (2002, August 7). Press release. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/08-2002/08072002a.html
22. U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/ offices/ES/NCEE/wwc.html
23. Viadero, D. (2003, March 19). Scholars aim to connect studies to schools' needs. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org
24. Willinsky, J. (2001). The strategic education research program and the public value of research. Educational Researcher, 30(1), 5-14.