Urban governance and social cohesion: Effects of urban restructuring policies in two Dutch cities

Cities

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 279-290

  Van Marissing, Erik ^a   Bolt, Gideon ^a   Van Kempen, Ronald ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Social cohesion; urban governance; urban restructuring policy

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; URBAN POLICY; URBAN SOCIETY;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; SOUTH HOLLAND; THE HAGUE; UTRECHT; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33745662895     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2005.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aalbers M., Van Beckhoven E., Van Kempen R., Musterd S., and Ostendorf W. Large housing estates in the Netherlands: overview of developments and problems in Amsterdam and Utrecht (2003), Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht University, Utrecht
2. Aalbers M., Van Beckhoven E., Van Kempen R., Musterd S., and Ostendorf W. Large housing estates in the Netherlands: policies and practices (2004), Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
3. Andersen H.T. The new urban politics of Europe: the area-based approach to regeneration policy. In: Andersen H.T., and Van Kempen R. (Eds). Governing European Cities; Social Fragmentation, Social Exclusion and Urban Governance (2001), Ashgate, Aldershot 233-253
4. Andersen H.T., and Van Kempen R. Social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance: an introduction. In: Andersen H.T., and Van Kempen R. (Eds). Social Fragmentation, Social Exclusion and Urban Governance: An Introduction (2001), Ashgate, Aldershot 1-18
5. Andersen H.T., and Van Kempen R. New trends in urban policies in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark. Cities 20 2 (2003) 77-86
6. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute for Planners 35 3 (1969) 216-224
7. Atkinson R., and Kintrea K. Opportunities and Despair, It's All in There', or, 'Every Area Has Its Problems': Everyday Experiences of Area Effects (2002), Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
8. Bailey N., Barker A., and MacDonald K. Partnership Agencies in British Urban Policy (1995), UCL Press, London
9. Blokland T. Urban Bonds, Social Relationships in an Inner City Neighbourhood (2003), Polity Press, Cambridge
10. Bolt G., and Torrance M. Sociale cohesie en stedelijke herstructurering (2004), DGW/Nethur Partnership, Utrecht/Den Haag
11. Brodsky A.E., O'Campo P.J., and Aronson R.E. PSOC in community context: multi-level correlates of a measure of psychological sense of community in low-income, urban neighbourhoods. Journal of Community Psychology 27 6 (1999) 659-679
12. Buys A., and Van Grinsven A. Herstructurering in tachtig plannen (1999), RIGO Research & Advies, Amsterdam
13. De Hart J. Theoretische uitgangspunten, conceptualisering en doelstellingen. In: De Hart J., Knol F., Maas-De Waal C., and Roes T. (Eds). Theoretische uitgangspunten, conceptualisering en doelstellingen (2002), Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag 3-30
14. Dekker, K and Bolt, G (2005) Social cohesion in post war estates in the Netherlands: differences between socioeconomic and ethnic groups. Urban Studies 42(13).
15. Dekker, K and Van Kempen, R (2004a) Governance arrangements focusing on social cohesion: the Big Cities Policies in The Hague, The Netherlands. Eura-Eurocities paper, 28-11-2003.
16. Dekker K., and Van Kempen R. Urban governance within the big cities policy. Cities 21 2 (2004) 109-117
17. Elander I., and Blanc M. Partnerships and democracy: a happy couple in urban governance?. In: Andersen H.T., and Van Kempen R. (Eds). Governing European Cities; Social Fragmentation, Social Exclusion and Urban Governance (2001), Ashgate, Aldershot 93-124
18. Ellen I.G., and Turner M.A. Does neighbourhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate 8 4 (1997) 833-866
19. Fischer C.S. The public and private worlds of city life. American Sociological Review 46 3 (1981) 306
20. Forrest R., and Kearns A. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies 38 12 (2001) 2125-2143
21. Friedrichs J., and Vranken J. European Urban Governance in Fragmented Societies. In: Andersen H.T., and Kempen R.V. (Eds). Social Fragmentation, Social Exclusion and Urban Governance (2001), Ashgate, Aldershot 41-70
22. Guest A.M., and Wierzbicki S.K. Social ties at the neigborhood level: two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review 35 1 (1999) 92-111
23. Hamilton D.K., Miller D.Y., and Payts J. Exploring the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the governing of metropolitan regions. Urban Affairs Review 40 2 (2004) 147-182
24. Henning C., and Lieberg M. Strong or weak ties? Neighbourhood networks in a new perspective. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 13 (1996) 3-26
25. Kearns A., and Forrest R. Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Studies 37 5-6 (2000) 995-1017
26. Keller S. The Urban Neighborhood: A Sociological Perspective (1968), Random House, New York
27. Kleinhans R., Veldboer L., and Duyvendak J.W. Integratie door differentiatie? Een onderzoek naar de sociale effecten van gemengd bouwen (2000), Erasmusuniversiteit, Rotterdam
28. Komter A., Burgers J., and Engbersen G. Het cement van de samenleving: een verkennende studie over solidariteit en cohesie (2000), Amsterdam Study Centre for the Metropolitan Environment, Amsterdam
29. Murie A., Knorr-Siedow T., and Van Kempen R. Large housing estates in Europe: general developments and theoretical backgrounds (2003), Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
30. Musterd S., and Goethals A. De invloed van de buurt (1999), SISWO/Instituut voor Maatschappijwetenschappen, Amsterdam
31. Pahl R. The search for social cohesion: from Durkheim to the European Commission. European Journal of Sociology 32 (1991) 345-360
32. Purdue D. Neighbourhood governance: leadership, trust and social capital. Urban Studies 38 12 (2001) 2211-2224
33. Rhodes R.A.W. Understanding Governance (1997), Open University Press, Buckingham
34. Schuyt K. Sociale cohesie en sociaal beleid. Drie publiekscolleges in De Balie (1997), De Balie, Amsterdam
35. Sprinkhuizen A. De stem van het volk. Over bewonersbetrokkenheid bij herstructurering als sociale interventie. In: Hortulanus R.P., and Machielse J.E.M. (Eds). Op het snijvlak van de fysieke en sociale leefomgeving. Het sociaal debat (2001), Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie B.V., Den Haag 89-101
36. Tönnies F. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie (1912), Karl Curtius, Berlin
37. Van Beckhoven E., and Van Kempen R. Het belang van de buurt: de invloed van herstructurering op activiteiten van blijvers en nieuwkomers in een Amsterdamse en Utrechtse buurt (2002), DGW/Nethur Partnership, Den Haag/Utrecht
38. Van der Horst H., Kullberg J., and Deben L. Wat wijken maakt: de wording van functionele, sociale en expressieve kwaliteiten van Vreewijk, Zuidwijk en Ommoord (2001), DGVH/Nethur Partnership, Utrecht/Den Haag
39. Van Kempen R. Big cities policy in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 91 2 (2000) 197-203
40. Van Kempen R. Social exclusion: the importance of context. In: Andersen H.T., and Van Kempen R. (Eds). Governing European Cities: Social Fragmentation, Social Exclusion and Urban Governance (2001), Ashgate, Aldershot 41-70
41. Van Kempen R., and Priemus H. Revolution in social housing in the Netherlands: possible effects of new housing policies. Urban Studies 39 2 (2002) 237-253
42. Van Marissing, E, Bolt, G, and Van Kempen, R (2005). Stedelijk beleid en sociale cohesie in twee herstructureringswijken. Nieuw-Hoograven, Utrecht; Bouwlust, Den Haag. Gouda: Habiforum.
43. Venkatesh S.A. American Project: The Rise and Fall of a Modern Ghetto (2002), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
44. Vranken, J, De Decker, P, and Van Nieuwenhuyze, I (2003) Social inclusion, urban governance and sustainability. Towards a conceptual framework for the UGIS Research Project. Antwerpen: Garant.
45. Wacquant L.J.D. Urban outcasts: stigma and division in the Black American ghetto and the French urban periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 17 3 (1993) 366-383
46. Wellman B. The Community Question Re-evaluated (1987), University of Toronto, Centre for Urban and Community Studies, Toronto
47. Wellman B., and Leighton B. Networks, neighborhoods and communities: approaches to the study of the community question. Urban Affairs Quarterly 14 3 (1979)
48. Wirth L. Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology 44 (1938) 1-24
49. Wonen en Milieu (2003) Hoograven aan zet. Tussenbalans juni 2003, Gemeente Utrecht, Wijkbureau Zuid.