Smoking and the Ø pattern; predictors of transitions through the stages of change

Health Education Research

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 305-314

  Hoving, E F ^a   Mudde, A N ^a,b   De Vries, H ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 33745661398     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyl033     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51: 390-95.
2. Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K (ed). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997; 99-120.
3. De Vries H, Mudde A, Leijs I et al. The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (EFSA): an example of integral prevention. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 611-26.
4. Bolman C, de Vries H. Psycho-social determinants and motivational phases in smoking behavior of cardiac inpatients. Prev Med 1998; 27: 738-47.
5. Ausems M, Mesters I, van Breukelen G et al. Short-term effects of a randomized computer-based out-of-school smoking prevention trial aimed at elementary schoolchildren. Prev Med 2002; 34: 581-89.
6. De Nooijer J, Lechner L, de Vries H. Social psychological correlates of paying attention to cancer symptoms and seeking medical help. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 915-20.
7. De Vries H, Backbier E. Self-efficacy as an important determinant of quitting among pregnant women who smoke: the phi-pattern. Prev Med 1994; 23: 167-74.
8. De Vries H, Mudde AN, Dijkstra A et al. Differential beliefs, perceived social influences, and self-efficacy expectations among smokers in various motivational phases. Prev Med 1998; 27: 681-89.
9. De Vries H, Mudde AN. Predicting stage transitions for smoking cessation applying the Attitude-Social Influence-Efficacy Model. Psychol Health 1998; 13: 369-85.
10. De Vries H, Mudde A, Dijkstra A. The Attitude-Social Influence-Efficacy Model applied to the prediction of motivational transitions in the process of smoking cessation. In: Norman P, Abraham C (eds). Understanding and Changing Health Behaviour: From Health Beliefs to Self Regulation. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 2000, 165-87.
11. Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Sutton SR. Stage theories of health behavior: conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychol 1998; 17: 290-99.
12. Bandura A. The anatomy of stages of change. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12: 8-10.
13. Sutton S. Back to the drawing board? A review of applications of the transtheoretical model to substance use. Addiction 2001; 96: 175-86.
14. Dijkstra A, de Vries H, Bakker M. Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996; 64: 758-63.
15. Dijkstra A, de Vries H, Roijackers J. Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation. Health Echic Res 1998; 13: 207-14.
16. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC et al. The Fagerstrom Test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991; 86: 1119-27.
17. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley, 1989.
18. De Vet E, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK et al. Determinants of forward stage transition from precontemplation and contemplation for fruit consumption. Am J Health Promot 2005; 19: 278-85.
19. Dijkstra A, Tromp D, Conijn B. Stage-specific psychological determinants of stage transition. Br J Health Psychol 2003; 8: 423-37.
20. Velicer WF, Norman GJ, Fava JL et al. Testing 40 predictions from the transtheoretical model. Addict Behav 1999; 24: 455-69.
21. Prochaska JO, Diclemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 1992; 47: 1102-14.
22. Sutton S. Stage theories of health behaviour. In: Conner M, Norman P (eds). Predicting Health Behaviour. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2005; 223-75.
23. Bandura A, Adams NE, Beyer J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. J Pers Soc Psychol 1977; 35: 125-39.
24. Dijkstra A, Bakker M, de Vries H. Subtypes within a sample of precontemplating smokers: a preliminary extension of the stages of change. Addict Behav 1997; 22: 327-37.
25. Kremers SPJ, Mudde AN, de Vries H. Subtypes within the precontemplation stage of adolescent smoking acquisition. Addict Behav 2001; 26: 237-51.
26. Dijkstra A, Borland R. Residual outcome expectations and relapse in ex-smokers. Health Psychol 2003; 22: 340-46.
27. Hoving EF, Mudde AN, de Vries H. Predictors of smoking relapse in a sample of Dutch adult smokers; the roles of gender and action plans. Addict Behav, in press.
28. Kenford SL, Smith SS, Wetter DW et al. Predicting relapse back to smoking: contrasting affective and physical models of dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 216-27.
29. Ockene JK, Emmons KM, Mermelstein RJ et al. Relapse and maintenance issues for smoking cessation. Health Psychol 2000; 19: 17-31.
30. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Misinterpretations and mis-applications of the transtheoretical model. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12: 11-12.