Assessment of differential branch pulmonary blood flow: A comparative study of phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide lung perfusion imaging

Heart

Volumn 92, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 963-968

  Sridharan, Shankar ^a   Derrick, G ^a   Deanfield, J ^a,b   Taylor, A M ^a,b  

^a GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG BLOOD FLOW; LUNG PERFUSION; LUNG SCINTISCANNING; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY VALVE STENOSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PULMONARY ARTERY; PULMONARY CIRCULATION; RADIONUCLIDE ANGIOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SERUM ALBUMIN; TECHNETIUM TC 99M AGGREGATED ALBUMIN; TIN COMPOUNDS;

EID: 33745658623     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.071746     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Moore P, Lock JE. Catheter intervention: balloon angioplasty: experimental studies, technology and methodology. In: Lock JE, Keane JF, Perry SB, eds. Diagnostic and interventional catheterization in congenital heart disease. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 2001:119-49.
2. Royal College of Radiologists. Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology: guidelines for doctors, 5th ed. London: Royal College of Radiologists, 2003.
3. Murthurangu V, Razavi R, Bogaert J, et al. Congenital heart disease. In: Bogaert J, Dymarkowski S, Taylor AM, eds. Clinical cardiac MRI. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005:439-73.
4. Canter CE, Gutierrez FR, Mirowitz SA, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary arterial morphology in cyanotic congenital heart disease by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1989;118:347-54.
5. Kondo C, Caputo GR, Semelka R, et al. Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity encoded cine NMR imaging: in vivo and in vitro evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:9-16.
6. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Klipstein RH, et al. In vivo validation of MR velocity imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:751-6.
7. Hundley WG, Hillis LD, Hamilton CA, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial stenosis with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2000;101:2375-81.
8. Silverman JM, Julien PJ, Herfkens RJ, et al. Quantitative pulmonary perfusion: MR imaging versus radionuclide lung scanning. Radiology 1993;189:699-701.
9. Kang IS, Redington AN, Leland N, et al. Differential regurgitation in branch pulmonary arteries after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a phase contrast cine magnetic resonance study. Circulation 2003;107:2938-43.
10. Taylor AM, Bogaert J. Cardiovascular imaging planes and segmentation. In: Bogaert J, Dymarlcowski S, Taylor AM, eds. Clinical cardiac MRI. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005:85-98.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-10.
12. Hernandez RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the mediastinal vessels. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 2002;10:237-51.
13. Powell AJ, Chung T, Landzberg MJ, et al. Accuracy of MRI evaluation of pulmonary blood supply in patients with complex pulmonary stenosis or atresia. Int J Card Imaging 2000;16:169-74.
14. Vogt FM, Goyen M, Debatin JF. MR angiography of the chest. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:29-41.
15. Roman KS, Kellenberger O, Farooq S, et al. Comparative imaging of differential pulmonary blood flow in patients with congenital heart disease: magnetic resonance imaging versus lung perfusion scintigraphy. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:295-301.