Does the generation effect apply to PowerPoint handouts?

Psychology and Education

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 28-38

  Stark Wroblewski, Kimberly ^a   Kreiner, David S ^a   Clause, Chris B ^a   Edelbaum, Jessica ^a   Ziser, Shirley B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745652496     PISSN: 00333077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Armbruster, B.B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R.F. Flippo & D.C. Caverly (Eds.) Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bartsch, R.A., & Cobern, K.M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education, 41, 77-86.
3. d'Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P.C. (1997) Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1198-1208.
4. Feldman, K.A. (1997). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry & J.C. Smart (eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice, 368-395.
5. Foos, P.W., Mora, J.J., & Tkacz, S. (1994). Student study techniques and the generation effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 567-576.
6. Kiewra, K.A., DuBois, N.F., Christian, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595-597.
7. Kiewra, K.A., Benton, S.L., Kirn, S.I., Risch, N., & Christenson, M. (1995). Effects of notetaking and their relationship with information processing ability and academic achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 14, 110-117.
8. Kunkel, K.R. (2004). A research note assessing the benefit of presentation software in two different lecture courses. Teaching Sociology, 32, 188-196.
9. Marsh, H.W. (1991). A multidimensional perspective on students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: Reply to Abrami and d'Apollonia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 416-421.
10. Marsh, H.W., & Dunkin, M.J. (1992). Students' evaluation of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Agathon.
11. Marsh, H.W. & Roche, L.A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52, 1187-1197.
12. Rankin, E.L., & Hoaas, D.J. (2001a). Teaching note: Does the use of computer generated slide presentations in the classroom affect student performance and interest. Eastern Economic Journal, 27(3), 355-366.
13. Rankin, E.L., & Hoaas, D.J. (2001b). The use of PowerPoint and student performance. Atlantic Economic Journal, 29(1), 113.
14. Slamecka, N.J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of aphenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
15. Turkic, S. (2004). How computers change the way we think. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(21), B26.
16. Young, J.R. (2004). When good technology means bad teaching, Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(12), A31.