Aeroelastic analysis through linear and non-linear methods: A summary of flutter prediction in the PUMA DARP

Aeronautical Journal

Volumn 110, Issue 1107, 2006, Pages 333-343

  Taylor, N V ^a   Allen, C B ^a   Gaitonde, A L ^a   Jones, D P ^a   Vio, G A ^b   Cooper, J E ^b   Rampurawala, A M ^c   Badcock, K J ^c   Woodgate, M A ^c   Henshaw, M J De C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^d BAE SYSTEMS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); INTERPOLATION; PRODUCT DESIGN;

CFD-CSD METHODS; FLUTTER BOUNDARY PREDICTION; MDO WING DESIGN; NON-LINEAR METHODS;

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33745636385     PISSN: 00019240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0001924000013208     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. OSHER, S. and CHARKRAVARTHY, S. Upwind schemes and boundary conditions with applications to Euler equations in general geometries, J Computational Physics, 1981, 50, pp 447-481.
2. VAN LEER, B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme II: Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second order scheme, J Computational Physics, 1974, 14, pp 361-374.
3. JAMESON, A. Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings, AIAA Paper 91-1596.
4. SCHMIDT, W., JAMESON, A. and TURKEL, E. Numerical solutions of the euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes, 1981, AIAA-Paper 81-1259.
5. GAITONDE, A.L. A dual-time method for the solution of the unsteady euler equations, Aeronaut J, October 1994, 98, 978, pp 283-291.
6. MELSON, N.D., SANETRIK, M.D. and ATKINS, H.L. Time-accurate Navier-Stokes calculations with multigrid acceleration, 1993, Technical Report CP 3224, NASA.
7. GERADIN, M. and RIXEN, D. Mechanical Vibrations, Second edition, 1997, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
8. BATHE, K.J. Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, 1982, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
9. GOURA, G.S.L. Time Marching Analysis of Flutter using Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2001, PhD thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Glasgow University.
10. JONES, D.P. Force transfer in aeroelastic calculations, December 2002, Technical Report AE047, University of Bristol.
11. GORDON, W.J. and HALL, C.A. Construction of curvilinear co-ordinates systems and applications to mesh generation, Int J for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1973, 7, pp 461 -477.
12. ALBANO, E. and RODDEN, W.P. A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows, AIAA J, 1969, 7, pp 179-285.
13. GIESING, J.P., KALMAN, T.P. and RODDEN, W.P. Subsonic unsteady aerodynamics for general configurations; Part I, Vol I - direct application of the nonplanar doublet-lattice method, 1971, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-71-5, Part I, Vol I, Airforce Flight Dynamics Laboratory.
14. RODDEN, W.P., GIESING, J.P. and KALMAN, T.P. Refinements of the nonplanar aspects of the subsonic double-lattice lifting surface method, J Aircr, 1972, 9, pp 69-73.
15. LIU, D.D. KAO, Y.F. and FUNG, K.Y. An efficient method for computing unsteady transonic aerodynamics of swept wings with control surfaces, J Aircraft, 1988, 52, (1), pp 25-31.
16. YATES, E.C. Standard aeroelastic configurations for "dynamic response I - wing 445.6, September 1985, Technical Report 765, AGARD. Includes Tech Report TN-D-1616 as an Appendix.
17. Version 3.2. ZAERO Applications Manual, Zona Technology, Arizona.
18. DA SILVA, R.G.A and DE FARIA MELLO, O.A. Prediction of transonic flutter using Nastran with aerodynamic coefficients tuned to Navier Stokes computations, 1999, CEAS/AIAA/ICASE/NASA meeting on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, June 1999, Norfolk,VA, USA.
19. BATINA, J.T., BENNETT, R.M., SEIDEL, D.A., CUNNINOHAM, H.J. and BLAND, S. Recent advances in transonic computational aeroelasticity, Computers and Fluids, 1998, 30, (172), pp 29-37.
20. EDWARDS, J.T. Calculated viscous and scale effects on transonic aeroelasticity, 1997, AGARD SMP meeting on Numerical Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Simulation, Aalborg, Denmark, Published in AGARD R-822, October 1997.
21. GUPTA, K.K. Development of a finite element aeroelastic analysis capability, J Aircr, 1996, 33, (5), pp 995-1002.
22. MELVILLE, R.B., MORTON, S.A and RIZZETTA, D.P. Implementation of fully-implioit aeroelastic Navier-Stokes solver, 1997, 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 29 June-2 July 1997, Snowmass Village, CO, USA, AIAA paper 97-2039, 1997.
23. RAUSCH, R. D., BATINA, J.T, and YANG, H.T. Three-dimensional time-marching aeroelastic analyses using an unstructured-grid Euler method. AIAA J, 1993, 31, (9), pp 1626-1633.
24. LESONNE, M. and FARHAT, C. High order subiteration-free staggered algorithm for nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems. AIAA J, 1998, 36, (9), pp 1754-1757.
25. GORDNIER, R.E. and MELVILLE, R.B. Transonic flutter simulations using an implicit aeroelastic solver, J Aircr, 2000, 37, (5), pp 872-879.
26. TAYLOR, N.V., JONES, D.P., GAITONDE, A., ALLEN, C.B., BADCOCK, K.J., WOODGATE, M.A., RAMPURAWAL, A.M., COOPER, J.E. and VIO, G.A. Evaluation of the influence of aerodynamic modelling on the transonic aeroelastic prediction of three wing test cases, October 2004, Technical report, PUMA DARP.
27. GIRODOUX-LAVIGNE, P., GRISVAL, J.P., GUILLEMOT, S., HENSHAW, M., KARLSSON, A., SELMIN, V., SMITH, J., TEUPOOTAHITI, E. and WINZELL, B. Comparison of static and dynamic fluid-structure interaction solutions in the case of a highly flexible modern transport aircraft win, J Aero Sci and Tech, 2003, 7, pp 121-133.
28. GIRODOUX-LAVIGNE, P., GRISVAL, J.P., GUILLEMOT, S., HENSHAW, M., KARLSSON, A., SELMIN, V., SMITH, J., TEUPOOTAHITI, E. and WINZELL, B. Comparative study of advanced fluid-structure interaction methods in'the case of a highly flexible wing, 2001, Results from the UNSI program, International Forum Aeroelasticity Structural Dynamics, June 2001, Madrid.
29. HAASE, W., SELMIN, V. and WINZELL, B. (EDS). Progress in Computational Flow-Structure Interaction, 2003, Vol 81 of Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Springer-Verlag.