Paper and electronic diaries: Too early for conclusions on compliance rates and their effects - Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout, and Reis (2006)

Psychological Methods

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 106-111

  Broderick, Joan E ^a   Stone, Arthur A ^a,b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Scientific Advisory Board of Invivodata   (United States)

Author keywords

Adherence; Compliance; Diary; Research methods; Self report

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL RECORD; MICROCOMPUTER; MOTIVATION; NOTE; PAPER; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF DISCLOSURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; WRITING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL RECORDS; MOTIVATION; PAPER; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF DISCLOSURE; WRITING;

EID: 33745634681     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.106     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Boudes, P. (1998). Drug compliance in therapeutic trials: A review. Controlled Clinical Trials, 19, 257-268.
2. Broderick, J., Arnold, D., Kudielka, B., & Kirschbaum, C. (2004). Salivary cortisol sampling compliance: Comparison of patients and healthy volunteers. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 636-650.
3. Broderick, J., Schwarte, J., Shiftman, S., Hufford, M., & Stone, A. (2003). Signaling does not adequately improve diary compliance. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 139-148.
4. Bushnell, D. M., Martin, M. L., & Parasuraman, B. (2003). Electronic versus paper questionnaires: A further comparison in persons with asthma. Journal of Asthma, 40, 751-762.
5. Cheng, C., Studdiford, J. S., Chambers, C. V., Diamond, J. J., & Paynter, N. (2002). The reliability of patient self-reported blood pressures. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich), 4, 259-264.
6. Ciree, A., Hanon, O., Bureau, J. M., Mourad, J. J., & Girerd, X. (2001). Influence of protocol on the quality of blood pressure self-monitoring. Archives de Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, 94, 893-896.
7. Drummond, H. E., Ghosh, S., Ferguson, A., Brackenridge, D., & Tiplady, B. (1995). Electronic quality of life questionnaires: A comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Quality of Life Research, 4, 21-26.
8. Gonder-Frederick, L. A., Julian, D. M., Cox, D. J., Clarke, W. L., & Carter, W. R. (1988). Self-measurement of blood glucose. Accuracy of self-reported data and adherence to recommended regimen. Diabetes Care, 11, 579-585.
9. Green, A. S., Rafaeli, E., Bolger, N., Shrout, P. E., & Reis, H. T. (2006). Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods, 11, 87-105.
10. Hanscom, B., Lurie, J. D., Homa, K., & Weinstein, J. N. (2002). Computerized questionnaires and the quality of survey data. Spine, 27, 1797-1801.
11. Hufford, M. R., Stone, A. A., Shiftman, S., Schwartz, J. E., & Broderick, J. E. (2002). Paper versus electronic diaries: Compliance and subject evaluations. Applied Clinical Trials, 11, 38-43.
12. Johannes, C., Woods, J., Crawford, S., Cochran, H., Tran, D., & Schuth, B. (2000). Electronic versus paper instruments for daily data collection. Annals of Epidemiology, 10, 457.
13. Johnson, K. A., Partsch, D. J., Rippole, L. L., & McVey, D. M. (1999). Reliability of self-reported blood pressure measurements. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159, 2689-2693.
14. Kudielka, B., Broderick, J., & Kirschbaum, C. (2003). Compliance with saliva sampling protocols: Electronic monitoring reveals invalid cortisol daytime profiles in noncompliant subjects. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 313-319.
15. Litt, M., Cooney, N., & Morse, P. (1998). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with treated alcoholics: Methodological problems and potential solutions. Health Psychology, 17, 4852.
16. Mallion, J. M., Baguet J. P., Siehe, J. P., Tremel, F., & de Gaudemaris, R. (1998). Compliance, electronic monitoring and antihypertensive drugs. Journal of Hypertension, 16(Suppl.), S75-S79.
17. Mazze, R. S., Shamoon, H., Pasmantier, R., Lucido, D., Murphy, J., Hartmann, K., et al. (1984). Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Medicine, 77, 211-217.
18. Nordmann, A., Frach, B., Walker, T., Martina, B., & Battegay, E. (2000). Comparison of self-reported home blood pressure measurements with automatically stored values and ambulatory blood pressure. Blood Pressure, 9, 200-205.
19. Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005). Drug therapy: Adherence to medication. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 487-497.
20. Palermo, T. M., Valenzuela, D., & Stork, P. P. (2004). A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: Impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain, 107, 213-219.
21. Rand, C. S., Wise, R. A., Nides, M., Simmons, M. S., Bleecker, E. R., Kusek, J. W., et al. (1992). Metered-dose inhaler adherence in a clinical trial. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 146, 1559-1564.
22. Ryan, J. M., Corry, J. R., Attewell, R., & Smithson, M. J. (2002). A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version. Quality of Life Research, 11, 19-26.
23. Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Atienza, A., & Nebling, L. (Eds.), (in press). The science of real-time data capture. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24. Stone, A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J., Broderick, J., & Hufford, M. (2002). Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. British Medical Journal, 324, 1193-1194.
25. Stone, A., Shiffman, S., Schwarte, J., Broderick, J., & Hufford, M. (2003). Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Controlled Clinical Trials, 24, 182-199.
26. Stone, A., Turkkan, J., Bachrach, C., Jobe, J., Kurtzman, H., & Cain, V. (Eds.). (2000). The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Urquhart, J. (1996). Patient non-compliance with drug regimens: Measurement, clinical correlates, economic impact. European Heart Journal, 17(Suppl. A), 8-15.
28. Urquhart, J., & De Klerk, E. (1998). Contending paradigms for the interpretation of data on patient compliance with therapeutic drug regimens. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 251-267.
29. Williams, C. D., Scobie, I. N., Till, S., Crane, R., Lowy, C., & Sonksen, P. H. (1988). Use of memory meters to measure reliability of self blood glucose monitoring. Diabetic Medicine, 5, 459-462.
30. Ziegler, O., Kolopp, M., Got, I., Genton, P., Debry, G., & Drouin, P. (1989). Reliability of self-monitoring of blood glucose by CSII-treated patients with type I diabetes. Diabetes Care, 12, 184-188.