Rate of pathology from atypical glandular cell Pap tests classified by the Bethesda 2001 nomenclature

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 107, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1285-1291

  DeSimone, Christopher P ^a   Day, Misty E ^b   Tovar, Molly M ^b   Dietrich III, Charles S ^b   Eastham, Mary L ^b   Modesitt, Susan C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOMETRIUM BIOPSY; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; ENDOMETRIUM HYPERPLASIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADOLESCENT; AGED; CLASSIFICATION; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT TUMOR; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STATISTICS; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 33745633902     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218705.87329.4a     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-9.
2. Levine L, Lucci JA 3rd, Dinh TV. Atypical glandular cells: new Bethesda Terminology and Management Guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003;58:399-406.
3. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Wilkinson EJ; ASCCPSponsored Consensus Conference. 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. J Am Med Assoc 2002;287:2120-9.
4. Ronnett BM, Manos MM, Ransley JE. Fetterman BJ, Kinney WK, Hurley LB, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): cytopathologic features, histopathologic results, and human papillomavirus DNA detection. Hum Pathol 1999;30:816-25.
5. Kennedy AW, Salmieri SS, Wirth SL, Biscotti CV, Tuason LJ, Travarca MJ. Results of the clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGCUS) detected on cervical cytology screening. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 63:14-8.
6. Valdini A, Vaccaro C, Pechinsky G, Abernathy V. Incidence and evaluation of an AGUS Papanicolaou smear in primary care. J Am Board Fam Pract 2001;14:172-7.
7. Duska LR, Flynn CF, Chen A, Whall-Strojwas D, Goodman A. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:278-82.
8. Taylor RR, Guerrieri JP, Nash JD, Henry MR, O'Connor DM. Atypical cervical cytology: colposcopic follow-up using the Bethesda System. J Reprod Med 1993;38:443-7.
9. Goff BA, Atanasoff P, Brown E, Muntz HG, Bell DA, Rice LW. Endocervical glandular atypia in Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:101-4.
10. Zweizig S, Noller K, Reale F, Collis S, Resseguie L. Neoplasia associated with atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical cytology. Gynecol Oncol 1997;65:314-8.
11. Soofer SB, Sidawy MK. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: clinically significant lesions and means of patient follow-up. Cancer 2000;90:207-14.
12. Eddy GL, Wojtowycz MA, Piraino PS, Mazur MT. Papanicolaou smears by the Bethesda system in endometrial malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:999-1003.
13. Veljovich DS, Stoler MH, Andersen WA, Covell JL, Rice LW. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a five-year retrospective histopathologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:382-90.
14. Chhieng DC, Elgert P, Cohen JM, Cangiarella JF. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women. Cancer 2001;93:1-7.
15. Manetta A, Keefe K, Lin F, Ahdoot D, Kaleb V. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in cervical cytologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:883-8.
16. Sharpless KE, Schnatz PF, Mandavilli S, Greene JF, Sorosky JI. Dysplasia associated with atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:494-500.
17. Koonings PP, Price JH. Evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: is age important? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1457-9.
18. Geier CS, Wilson M, Creasman W. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:64-9.
19. Chhieng DC, Gallaspy S, Yang H, Roberson J, Eltoum I. Women with atypical glandular cells: a long-term follow-up study in a high-risk population. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;122:575-9.
20. Chhieng DC, Elgert P, Cangiarella JF, Cohen JM. Variation in the incidence of AGUS between different patient populations. Acta Cytol 2001;45:287-93.
21. Bennett BB, Takezawa K, Wilkinson EJ, Drew PA, Hardt NS. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance and other glandular cell abnormalities in a high-risk population. J Low Genit Tract Dis 1998;2:132-5.
22. Dinh TV, Haque M, Gracia JM, Lucci JA, Smith ER, Hannigan EV. Papanicolaou smears of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: histological correlations and suggestions for management. J Low Genit Tract Dis 1999;3:73-6.
23. Nasuti JF, Fleisher SR, Gupta PK. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): clinical considerations and cytohistologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26:186-90.
24. Tam KF, Cheung AN, Liu KL, Ng TY, Pun TC, Chan YM, et al. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:603-7.
25. Wyatt S, Ross FE, Bottorff D, Lancaster M. Geographics & age variations in invasive cervical cancer in Kentucky, 1995-1999. J Ky Med Assoc 2002;100:441-6.
26. Gurbuz A, Karateke A, Kabaca C, Kir G. Atypical glandular cells: improvement in cytohistologic correlation by the 2001 Bethesda system. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:903-10.
27. Sharpless KE, Schnatz PF, Mandavilli S, Greene JF, Sorosky JL. Lack of adherence to practical guidelines for women with atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology [published erratum appears in Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:1495]. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:501-6.