![]() |
Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages
|
Adequate regulation, a stop-gap measure, or part of a package? Debates on codes of conduct for scientists could be diverting attention away from more serious questions
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
RECOMBINANT DNA;
ARTICLE;
AWARENESS;
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE;
BIOSAFETY;
BIOTECHNOLOGY;
DNA MODIFICATION;
GENETIC ENGINEERING;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;
POLICY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
RESEARCH ETHICS;
RESPONSIBILITY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK REDUCTION;
SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;
SCIENTIST;
SOCIAL SECURITY;
TERRORISM;
VIRULENCE;
BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES;
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE;
BIOTERRORISM;
CODES OF ETHICS;
CRIME;
DISCLOSURE;
HUMANS;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
RESEARCH;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
|
EID: 33745626796
PISSN: 1469221X
EISSN: 14693178
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400683 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (19)
|