Situational intimacy as a predictor of compliance-gaining tactic selection

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 132-144

  Levine, Timothy R ^a   Wheeless, Lawrence R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745626653     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824099709388655     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boster, F. J., and Levine, T. R., 1988. Individual differences and compliance-gaining message selection: The effects of verbal aggressiveness, argumentativeness, dogmatism, and negativism. Communication Research Reports, 5: 114-119.
2. Brown, P., and Levenson, S., 1978. “ Universals in language usage ”. In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in social interaction, Edited by: Goody, E.N., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Burleson, B. R., Wilson, S. R., Waltman, M. S., Goering, E. M., Ely, T. K., and Whaley, R. B., 1986. Item desirability effects in compliance-gaining research: Seven studies documenting artifacts in the strategy selection procedure. Human Communication Research, 14: 429-486.
4. Clark, R. A., 1979. The impact of self interest and the desire for liking on the selection of communicative strategies. Communication Monographs, 46: 257-273.
5. Cody, M. J., and McLaughlin, M. L., 1980. Perceptions of compliance-gaining situations: A dimensional analysis. Communication Monographs, 47: 132-148.
6. Cody, M. J., McLaughlin, M. L., and Jordan, W. J., 1980. A multidimensional scaling of three sets of compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Quarterly, 28(1): 34-46.
7. Cody, M. J., McLaughlin, M. L., and Schneider, M. S., 1981. The impact of relational consequences and intimacy on the selection of interpersonal persuasion tactics: A reanalysis. Communication Quarterly, 29: 91-106.
8. Dillard, J. P., 1990. “ A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence ”. In Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages, Edited by: Dillard, J.P., Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
9. Dillard, J. P., and Burgoon, M., 1985. Situational influences on the selection of compliance-gaining messages: Two tests of the predictive utility of the Cody-McLaughlin typology. Communication Monographs, 52: 289-318.
10. Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., and Harden, J. M., 1989. Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56: 19-38.
11. Falbo, T., 1977. Multidimensional scaling of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(8): 537-547.
12. Fitzpatrick, M. A., and Winke, J., 1979. You always hurt the one you love: Strategies and tactics in interpersonal conflict. Communication Quarterly, 27: 3-11.
13. Hunter, J. P., Schmidt, F. L., and Jackson, G. B., 1982. Meta-analysis cumulating research findings across studies, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1984. “ Power in the classroom IV: Alternatives to discipline ”. In Communication Yearbook 8, Edited by: Bostrom, R. N., Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Knapp, M. L., Ellis, D. G., and Williams. 1980. Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms. Communication Monographs, 47(4): 262-278.
16. Levine, T. R., and Wheeless, L. R., 1990. Cross-situational consistency and use-nonuse tendencies in compliance-gaining tactic selections. The Southern Communication Journal, 56: 1-11.
17. Lim, T-S., 1990. “ Politeness behavior in social influence situation ”. In Seeking Compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages, Edited by: Dillard, J.P., Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
18. Marwell, G. M., and Schmitt, D. R., 1967. Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 30: 350-328.
19. Miller, G. R., Boster, F. J., Roloff, M. E., and Seibold, D. R., 1977. Compliance-gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning the effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44: 37-51.
20. Miller, M. D., 1982. Friendship, power, and the language of compliance-gaining. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1: 111-121.
21. O'Keefe, B. J., 1988. The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication Monographs, 55: 80-103.
22. Roloff, M. E., Janiszewshi, C. A., McGrath, M. A., Burns, C. S., and Manrai, L. A., 1988. Acquiring resources from intimates: When obligation substitutes for persuasion. Human Communication Research, 14: 364-396.
23. Rule, G. B., and Bisanz, G. L., 1987. “ Goals and strategies of persuasion: A cognitive schema for understanding social events ”. In Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, Edited by: Zanna, M.P., Olson, J.M., and Herman, C.P., Vol. 5, 185-206. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Seibold, D. R., Cantrill, J. G., and Meyers, R. A., 1986. “ Communication and interpersonal influence ”. In Handbook of interpersonal Communication, Edited by: Knapp, M.L., and Miller, G.R., Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Sillars, A. L., 1980. The stranger and the spouse as target persons for compliance-gaining strategies: A subjective utility model. Human Communication Research, 6: 265-279.
26. Wheeless, L. R., Barradough, R., and Stewart, R., 1983. “ Compliance-gaining and power in persuasion ”. In Communication Yearbook 7, Edited by: Bostrum, R.N., Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Wilson, S. R., 1990. Development and test of a cognitive rules model of interaction goals. Communication Monographs, 57: 81-103.