Development of matdymo (multi-agent for traffic simulation with vehicle dynamics model) I: development of traffic environment

International Journal of Automotive Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 25-34

  Cho, K Y ^a   Kwon, S J ^a   Suh, M W ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Interrupted flow model; Multi agent; Traffic simulation; Uninterrupted flow model; Vehicle dynamics; Virtual driving lane

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745624292     PISSN: 12299138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aerde, M. and Yager, S. (1988). Dynamic integrated freeway/traffic signal networks: Problems and proposed solutions. Transportation Research Part A, 22, 435-443.
2. Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M., Koutsopoulous, H. and Mishalani, R. (1998). A simulation-based system for traffic prediction. Paper presented at TRISTAN III, San Juan, Porto Rico.
3. Arentze, T. A. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2005). Information gain, novelty seeking and travel: a model of dynamic activity-travel behavior under conditions of uncertainty. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 2, 125-145.
4. Aycin, M. F. and Benekohal, R. F. (1998). Linear acceleration car-following model development and validation. Transportation Research Record 1644, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 10-19.
5. Chan, Y. (1974). Configuring a transportation route network via the method of successive approximation. Computers & Operations Research 1, 3, 385-420.
6. Cho, K. Y., Kwon, S. J. and Suh, M. W. (2005). Vehicle dynamics approach to multi-agent for traffic simulation. II: Development of vehicle and driver agent. Int. J. Automotive Technology, Accepted.
7. Drake, J. S., Schofer, J. L. and May, A. D. (1967). A statistical analysis of speed density hypothesis. Highway Research Record, 154, 53-87.
8. Elmarakbi, A. M. and Zu, J. W. (2004). Dynamic modeling and analysis of vehicle smart structures for frontal collision improvement. Int. J. Automotive Technology 5, 4, 247-255.
9. Fellendorf, M. (1994). VISSIM: A microscopic simulation tool to evaluate actuated signal control including bus priority. Technical Paper, Session 32, 64th ite Annual Meeting, Dallas.
10. García, O. A., Amin, J. M. and Wootton, R. (1995). Intelligent transportation systems-Enabling technologies. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 22, 4, 11-81.
11. Hernández, J., Cuena, J. and Molina, M. (1999). Real-time traffic management through knowledge-based models: the TRYS approach, tutorial on intelligent traffic management models, the 11th Mini-Euro Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Transportation Systems and Science, Helsinki, Finland.
12. Hu, T. Y. and Mahmassani, H. S. (1995). Evolution of network flows under real-time information: Day-to-day dynamic simulation assignment framework. Transportation Research Record, 1493, 46-56.
13. Huddart, K. W. (1969). The importance of stops in traffic signal progressions. Transportation Research 3, 1, 143-150.
14. Kukla, R., Kerridge, J., Willis, A. and Hine, J. (2001). PEDFLOW: Development of an autonomous agent model of pedestrian flow. Transportation Research Record No. 1774 Transportation Research Board, 11-17.
15. Kuri, J., Puech, N., Gagnaire, M. and Dotaro, E. (2002). Routing foreseeable lightpath demands using a tabu search meta-heuristic. Global Telecommunications Conf., 2803-2807.
16. Lin, M. T. and Gan, A. C. (1999). Signal timing optimization for oversaturated networks using TRANSYT-7F. Transportation Research Record, 1683, 118-126.
17. Maes, P. (1995), Artificial life meets entertainment: life like autonomous agents. Communications of the ACM 38, 11, 108-114.
18. Michalopoulos, P. G. and Pisharody, V. B. (1981). Derivation of delays based on improved macroscopic traffic models. Transportation Research Part B, 15, 5, 299-317.
19. Michalopoulos, P. G., Beskos, D. E. and Lin, J. K. (1984). Analysis of interrupted traffic flow by finite difference methods. Transportation Research Part B, 18, 4, 409-421.
20. Nagel, K. and Rickert, M. (2001). Parallel implementation of the TRANSIMS micro-simulation. Parallel Computing, 27, 1611-1639.
21. Nakamiti, G. and Freitas, R. (2002). Adaptive, real-time traffic control management. Int. J. Automotive Technology 3, 3, 89-94.
22. Newell, G. F. (1961). Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following. Operations Research, 9, 209-229.
23. Noland, R. B. (2001). Relationships between highway capacity and induced vehicle travel. Transportation Research Part A, 35, 1, 47-72.
24. Patrick, M., Sebald, A. V., Smith, N. T. and Quinn, M. L. (1988). An efficient AI based algorithm for validating pulsatile arterial pressure waveforms. Proc. Annual Int. Conf. IEEE, 4-7.
25. Peter, J. (1993). Development in Dynamic and activity-based approaches to travel analysis. Transportation Research Part A, 27, 154-156.
26. Pipes, L. A. (1953). An operational analysis of traffic dynamics. J. Applied Physics 24, 3, 274-281.
27. Polak, J. K. and Huang, X. (1999). Agent-based modeling system for activity-based models. Presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
28. Pue, A. J. (1982). Macroscopic traffic models for vehicle-follower automated transportation systems. Transportation Research Part B, 16, 2, 125-142.
29. Quadstone. (1999). Paramics Modeler V3.0 Reference Manual. Quadstone Ltd., Edinburgh, UK.
30. Roozemond, D. A. (1999). Using intelligent agents of urban traffic control systems. Proc. 11th Mini-Euro Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Transportation Systems and Science, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
31. Russell, S. J. and Norvig, P. (1995), Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice Hall. NJ. USA.
32. Salvini, A., Fulginei, F. R. and Coltelli, C. (2003). A neuro-genetic and time-frequency approach to maicro-modeling dynamic hysteresis in the harmonic regime. IEEE Trans., 39, 1401-1404.