Abuse of caesarean delivery in Brasil: Geographic dimensions of a medical aberration;L'abus du recours à la césarienne au Brésil: Dimensions géographiques d'une aberration médicale

Cahiers Sante

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 21-31

  Waniez, Philippe ^a   Wurtz, Blandine ^a   Brustlein, Violette ^b  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

^b Charge de Recherche au Centre de Recherche et de Documentation sur l'Amerique Latine (CREDAL)   (France)

Author keywords

Brazil; Gyneacology obstetrics; Health policy; Health system; Public health

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CESAREAN SECTION; FAMILY PLANNING; GEOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE; PHYSICIAN; URBAN AREA; UTERINE TUBE LIGATION; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

BIRTH RATE; BRAZIL; CESAREAN SECTION; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH SERVICES MISUSE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOSPITAL BED CAPACITY; HUMANS; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PREGNANCY; PRIVATE PRACTICE; REGISTRIES; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; STERILIZATION, REPRODUCTIVE; URBAN HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 33745619782     PISSN: 11575999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Venâncio SI. Notas sobre Nascimento et Parto. Bulletin du Groupe d'études sur la naissance et l'accouchement 1998; III. www.fraternet.org/naissance/docs/cesarienne-bresil.htm#version
2. Belizán JM, et al. Rates and implications of caesarean sections Latin America: ecological study. BMJ 1999; 319: 1397-402.
3. de Mello Jorge MH. Avaliaçao do sistema de informaçao sobre nascidos vivos. Revista de Saude Publica 1993; 27 (Suppl. São Paulo): 1-46.
4. de Souza LM. A Cobertura das estatisticas do SINASC a luz do Censo 2000: mesorregiões de Minas Gerais. X seminario sobre a Economia Mineira, 2001.
5. Bozon M, Enoch E. Brésil: la transition démographique rapide d'un pays hétérogène. Population et Sociétés 1999; (345): 2.
6. Rosas CF. Esterilização: qual é o «espirito da Lei?» Ser Médico. Revista do Conselho Regional de Medicina do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo, SP) 1999; (8): 32-5.
7. Sociedade Civil Bem-Estar no Brazil (Bemfam). Pesquisa Nacional sobre Demografia e Saúde de 1996. Rio de Janeiro: Bemfam, 1997.
8. Berquo E. Contraception and caesareans in Brazil: an example of bad reproductive health practice in need of exemplary action. Estudos Feministas 1993; 1: 461-72.
9. Waniez P, Brustlein V. Fonction hospitalière et système urbain au Bréil. Cah Sante 2000; 10: 145-53.
10. Direction de la recherche, des études, de l'évaluation et des statistiques (OREES). La pratique des césariennes: évolution et variabilité entre 1998 et 2001. Ministère des affaires sociales, du travail et de la solidarité. Études des Résultats 2003; (275): 1-11.
11. Éboli E. Cesarianas diminuem, mas índice ainda é alto. O globo 19 mai 2002 www.amigasdoparto.com.br/oglobo.html.
12. Gardenal I. Brasil comemora perda de um recorde: o de cesarianas. www.unicamp.br/unicamp/unicamp_hoje/ju/setembro2002/unihoje_ju188pag9b.html.