Impacts of telehomecare on patients, providers, and organizations

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 363-369

  Lamothe, Lise ^a   Fortin, Jean Paul ^b   Labbé, Françoise ^b   Gagnon, Marie Pierre ^b   Messikh, Djamel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH CARE; HOSPITALS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); PATIENT TREATMENT; PULMONARY DISEASES;

CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE; HEALTHCARE SERVICES; POLYVALENT MODEL; TELEHOMECARE (THC);

TELEMEDICINE;

ARTICLE; CANADA; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEART FAILURE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELEHEALTH;

EID: 33745610870     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.363     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bashshur RL, Reardon TG, Shannon GW. Telemedicine: A new health care delivery system. Ann Rev Public Health 2000;21:613-637.
2. Ryan P, Kobb R, Hilsen P. Making the right connection: Matching patients to technology. Telemed J E Health 2003;9:81-88.
3. Jennett PA, Affleck Hall L, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, Young B, Lorenzetti D, Scott RE. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: A systematic review J Telemed Telecare 2003;9:311-320.
4. Young NL, Barden W, Lefort S, Nijssen-Jordan C, Daniels C, Booth M, Dick PT. Telehomecare: A comparison of three Canadian models. The Tele-Homecare Team. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10:45-52.
5. Britton BP. Soins non épisodiques des éléves du primaire souffrant d'asthme chronique-Utilisation de la technolo gie des télésoins à domicile. Ottawa: Cybersanté Canada, 2000.
6. Clough K, Mallinson M, Jardine I. The potential for telemedicine to improve coronary heart disease services. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7(Suppl 1):49-51.
7. Lahdenperä L. Patients' view about information technology in the treatment of hypertension. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6:108-113.
8. Fortin JP, Lamothe L. CLSC du Futur: Soutien à domicile et télésoins. Research report. Santé Canada, CEFRIO, 2004.
9. Demiris G, Speedie SM, Hicks LL. Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology. J Med Syst 2004;28:575-579.
10. Wakefield BJ, Holman JE, Ray A, Morse J, Kienzle MG. Nurse and patient preferences for telehealth home care. Geriatric Times 2004;5(2). www.geriatric-times.com/g040427.html Last accessed October 22, 2004.
11. Hebert MA, Korabek B. Stakeholder readiness for telehomecare: Implications for implementation. Telemed J E Health 2004;10:85-92.
12. Cuba E, Lincoln Y. Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss. 1981.
13. Huberman AM, Miles MB. Analyse de données qualitatives: recueil de nouvelles méthodes. Bruxelles Éditions De Doeck, 1991.
14. Arnaert A, Delesie L. Telenursing for the elderly. The case for care via video-telephony. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7:311-316.
15. Demeris G, Speedie S, Finkelstein S. Change of patients' perception of TeleHomeCare. J Telemed E-Health 2001;7:241-248.
16. Elfort P, Famsay M. Télésoins à domicile: Le projet pilote du téléhospice de West Prince Ottawa Presented at the 5th international conference on the medical aspects of telemedicine. Santé Canada, 2001.
17. Wensing M. Evidence-based patient empowerment. Qual Health Care 2000;9:199-202.
18. Abbott A. The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
19. Strauss, A.H. and al. The hospital and its negotiated order. In: Freidson E, ed. The hospital in modern society. London: Collier-MacMillan, 1963:147-169.