Comparative population genetic study of two oligophagous insects associated with the same hosts

Heredity

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 38-45

  Kerdelhue C ^a   Magnoux, E ^b   Lieutier, F ^c   Roques, A ^b   Rousselet, J ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b Inst Natl de la Rech Agronom   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

Author keywords

Dispersal; Host use; Microsatellites; Pinus; Thaumetopoea pityocampa; Tomicus piniperda

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

BEETLE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; MOTH; PLANT; POPULATION GENETICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BARK; BEETLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; FRANCE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; LARVA; MOTH; PARASITOLOGY; PINE; POPULATION GENETICS;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; FRANCE; GENE FLOW; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; LARVA; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MOTHS; PINUS; PLANT BARK; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; MASSIF CENTRAL; WESTERN EUROPE;

COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; SCOLYTINAE; THAUMETOPOEA PITYOCAMPA; TOMICUS PINIPERDA;

EID: 33745610029     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800836     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson B, Olivieri I, Lourmas M, Stewart BA (2004). Comparative population genetic structures and local adaptation of two mutualists. Evolution 58: 1730-1747.
2. Balloux F, Lugon-Moulin N (2002). The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 11: 155-165.
3. Battisti A, Stastny M, Netherer S, Robinet C, Schopf A, Roques A et al (2005). Expansion of geographic range in the pine processionary moth caused by increased whiter temperatures. Ecol Appl 15: 2084-2096.
4. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (1996-2004). GENETIK 4.05, logiciel sous Windows™ pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France).
5. Bois E, Lieutier F (2000). Resistance level in Scots pine clones and artificial introductions of Tomicus piniperda (Col. Scolytidae) and Leptographium wingfieldii (Deuteromycetes). J Appl Entomol 124: 163-167.
6. Brouat C, Chevallier H, Meusnier S, Noblecourt T, Rasplus J-Y (2004). Specialization and habitat: spatial and environmental effects on abundance and genetic diversity of forest generalist and specialist Carabus species. Mol Ecol 13: 1815-1826.
7. Brouat C, Sennedot F, Audiot P, Leblois R, Rasplus J-Y (2003). Fine-scale genetic structure of two carabid species with contrasted levels of habitat specialization. Mol Ecol 12: 1731-1745.
8. Chararas C (1962). Etude biologique des Scolytides des conifères. XXXVIII. Editions Paul Lechevalier: Paris, France.
9. Codella Jr SG, Raffa KR (1993). Defense strategies of folivorous sawflies. VII. Gregarious behavior: multiple selection pressures?. In: Wagner M, Raffa KR (eds) Sawflies Life History Adaptation to Woody Plants. Academic Press: San Diego, pp 279-284.
10. Démolin G (1969a). Comportement des adultes de Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. Dispersion spatiale, importance écologique. Ann Sci Forest 26: 81-102.
11. Démolin G (1969b). Bioecologia de la procesionaria del pino Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. Incidencia de los factores climaticos. Bol Serv Plagas For 12: 9-24.
12. Dres M, Mallet J (2002). Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philos Trans Roy Soc London B 357: 471-492.
13. Garland Jr T, Adolph SC (1994). Why not to do two-species comparative studies: limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiol Zool 67: 797-828.
14. Herz A, Heitland W (2002). Comparison of the fat allocation patterns in female pine sawflies (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Eur J Entomol 99: 117-120.
15. Huchon H, Démolin G (1970). La bioécologie de la processionnaire du pin. Dispersion potentielle - Dispersion actuelle. Rev For Fr 22: 220-234.
16. Jobet E, Durand P, Langand J, Müller-Graf CDM, Hugot JP, Bougnoux ME et al (2000). Comparative genetic diversity of parasites and their hosts: population structure of an urban cockroach and its haplo-diploid parasite (oxyuroid nematode). Mol Ecol 9: 481-486.
17. Kerdelhué C, Mondor-Genson G, Rasplus J-Y, Robert A, Lieutier F (2003). Characterization of 5 microsatellite loci in the pine shoot beetle Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Mol Ecol Notes 3: 100-101.
18. Kerdelhué C, Roux-Morabito G, Forichon J, Chambon J-M, Robert A, Lieutier F (2002). Population genetic structure of Tomicus piniperda L. Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and validation of T. destruens (Woll.). Mol Ecol 11: 483-494.
19. Liebhold A, Elkinton J, Williams D, Muzika RM (2000). What causes outbreaks of the gypsy moth in North America? Popul Ecol 42: 257-266.
20. Lieutier F (2002). Mechanisms of resistance in conifers and bark beetle attack strategies. In: Wagner MR, Clancy KM, Lieutier F, Paine TD (eds) Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht. pp 31-77.
21. Michalakis Y, Excoffier L (1996). A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci. Genetics 142: 1061-1064.
22. Nei M (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
23. Peterson MA, Denno RF (1998a). The influence of dispersal and diet breadth on patterns of genetic isolation by distance in phytophagous insects. Am Nat 152: 428-446.
24. Peterson MA, Denno RF (1998b). Life history strategies and the genetic structure of phytophagous insect populations. In: Mopper S, Strauss SH (eds) Genetic Structure and Local Adaptation in Natural Insect Populations: Effect of Ecology, Life History, and Behavior. Chapman & Hall: New-York. pp 263-322.
25. Raffa KF, Berryman AA (1983). The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol Monogr 53: 27-49.
26. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995). GENEPOP (version 1.2): a population genetics software for exact tests and eucumenicism. J Hered 86: 248-249.
27. Ritzerow S, Konrad H, Stauffer C (2004). Phylogeography of the Eurasian pine shoot beetle Tomicus piniperda L. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Eur J Entomol 101: 13-19.
28. Rousselet J, Magnoux E, Kerdelhué C (2004). Characterization of five microsatellite loci in the pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera Notodontidae Thaumetopoeinae). Mol Ecol Notes 4: 213-214.
29. Rousset F (1996). Equilibrium values of measures of population subdivision for stepwise mutation processes. Genetics 142: 1357-1362.
30. Rousset F (1997). Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145: 1219-1228.
31. Saitou N, Nei M (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406-425.
32. Sallé A, Arthoffer W, Lieutier F, Stauffer C, Kerdelhué C (2006). Phylogeography of a species-specific insect: genetic structure of Ips typographus in Europe does not reflect the past fragmentation of its host. Biol J Linn Soc (in press).
33. Salvato P, Battisti A, Concato S, Masutti L, Patarnello T, Zane L (2002). Genetic differentiation in the winter pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa-wilkinsoni complex), inferred by AFLP and mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol Ecol 11: 2435-2444.
34. Salvato P, Simonato M, Patarnello T, Masutti L, Battisti A (2005). Do sexual pheromone traps provide biased information of the local gene pool in the pine processionary moth? Agric Forest Entomol 7: 127-132.
35. Sauvard D (1993). Reproductive capacity of Tomicus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae). 2. Analysis of the various sister broods. J Appl Entomol 116: 25-38.
36. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000). Arlequin Version 2.001: A Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva: Geneva.
37. Slatkin M (1987). Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236: 787-792.
38. Van Dongen S, Matthysen E, Dhondt AA (1996). Restricted male whiter moth (Operophtera brumata L.) dispersal among host trees. Acta Oecol 17: 319-329.
39. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
40. Zhang DX (2004). Lepidopteran microsatellite DNA: redundant but promising. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 507-509.