Aggregation of valued relations applied to association rule interestingness measures

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3885 LNAI, Issue , 2006, Pages 203-214

  Barthélemy, Jean Pierre ^a   Legrain, Angélique ^a   Lenca, Philippe ^a   Vaillant, Benoît ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ BRETAGNE SUD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

ASSOCIATION RULE INTERESTINGNESS MEASURES; KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY;

SET THEORY;

EID: 33745599292     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11681960_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf., pages 207-216, 1993.
2. K.J. Arrow. Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Foundations and Wiley, 1951.
3. J. Azé and Y. Kodratoff. Evaluation de la résistance au bruit de quelques mesures d'extraction de règles d'assocation. EGC 2002, 1(4):143-154, 2002.
4. C. Blake and C. Merz. UCI repository of machine learning databases. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html, 1998.
5. e LFA, pages 297-302, 2005.
6. U. Bodenhofer and J. Küng. Fuzzy orderings in flexible query answering systems. Soft Computing, 8(7):512-522, 2004.
7. C. Borgelt and R. Kruse. Induction of association rules: APRIORI implementation. In 15th Conf. on Computational Statistics, 2002.
8. J. Brans, B. Mareschal, and P. Vincke. PROMETHEE: A New Family of Outranking Methods in MCDM. IFORS 84, 1984.
9. S. Brin, R. Motwani, J. D. Ullman, and S. Tsur. Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In J. Peckham, editor, ACM SIGMOD 1997 Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pages 255-264, 1997.
10. K. W. Church and P. Hanks. Word association norms, mutual information an lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1):22-29, 1990.
11. J. Cohen. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:37-46, 1960.
12. P. Fishburn. Handbook of Utility Theory, volume 1, chapter Stochastic utility, pages 273-319. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1998.
13. J. Fodor and M. Roubens. Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
14. I. J. Good. The estimation of probabilities: An essay on modern bayesian methods. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965.
15. R. Gras, S. Ag. Almouloud, M. Bailleuil, A. Larher, M. Polo, H. Ratsimba-Rajohn, and A. Totohasina. L'implication Statistique, Nouvelle Méthode Exploratoire de Données. Application la Didactique, Travaux et Thèses. La Pensée Sauvage, 1996.
16. R. Gras, P. Kuntz, R. Couturier, and F. Guillet. Une version entropique de l'intensité d'implication pour les corpus volumineux. EGC 2001, 1(1-2):69-80, 2001.
17. J. L. Guigues and V. Duquenne. Familles minimales d'implications informatives résultant d'un tableau de données binaires. Math. Sci. hum., 25(95):5-18, 1986.
18. International Business Machines. IBM Intelligent Miner User's Guide, Version 1 Release 1, SH12-6213-00. 1996.
19. H. J. Jeffreys. Some tests of significance treated by the theory of probability. In Proc. of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, number 31, pages 203-222, 1935.
20. S. Lallich and O. Teytaud. Évaluation et validation de l'intérêt des règles d'association. RNTI-E-1, pages 193-217, 2004.
21. A. Legrain. Agrégation de mesures de qualité de règles d'association, rapport de DEA MIASH, 2004.
22. R. Lehn, F. Guillet, P. Kuntz, H. Briand, and J. Philippé. Felix: An interactive rule mining interface in a KDD process. In HCP'99, pages 169-174, 1999.
23. P. Lenca, P. Meyer, P. Picouet, B. Vaillant, and S. Lallich. Critères d'évaluation des mesures de qualité en ECD. RNTI, (1):123-134, 2003.
24. P. Lenca, P. Meyer, B. Vaillant, and S. Lallich. A multicriteria decision aid for interestingness measure selection. Technical report, GET / ENST Bretagne, 2004.
25. P. Lenca, P. Meyer, B. Vaillant, and P. Picouet. Aide multicritère à la décision pour évaluer les indices de qualité des connaissances - modélisation des préférences de l'utilisateur. EGC 2003, 1(17):271-282, 2003.
26. P. Lenca, P. Meyer, B. Vaillant, P. Picouet, and S. Lallich. Évaluation et analyse multicritère des mesures de qualité des règles d'association. RNTI-E-1, pages 219-246, 2004.
27. I. Lerman and J. Azé. Une mesure probabiliste contextuelle discriminante de qualité des règles d'association. EGC 2003, 1(17):247-262, 2003.
28. J. Loevinger. A systemic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability. Psychological monographs, 61(4), 1947.
29. K. Pearson. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution, iii. regression, heredity and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 1896.
30. V. Peneva and I. Popchev. Properties of the aggregation operators related with fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, (139):615-633, 2003.
31. G. Piatetsky-Shapiro. Discovery, analysis and presentation of strong rules. In Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 229-248. AAAI/MIT Press, 1991.
32. S. Saminger, R. Mesiar, and U. Bodenhofer. Domination of aggregation operators and preservation of transitivity. Internat. J. Uncertain. Pazziness Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(Suppl.):11-35, 2002.
33. M. Sebag and M. Schoenauer. Generation of rules with certainty and confidence factors from incomplete and incoherent learning bases. In EKAW'88, pages 28-1 - 28-20. 1988.
34. P.-N. Tan, V. Kumar, and J. Srivastava. Selecting the right interestingness measure for association patterns. In Eighth ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf., pages 32-41, 2002.
35. B. Vaillant, P. Lenca, and S. Lallich. A clustering of interestingness measures. In Discovery Science, volume 3245 of LNAI, pages 290-297. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
36. B. Vaillant, P. Picouet, and P. Lenca. An extensible platform for rule quality measure benchmarking. In HCP'03, pages 187-191, 2003.
37. T. Zhang. Association rules. In PADKK 2000, volume 1805 of LNCS, 2000.