Developing national sport policy through consultation: The rules of engagement

Journal of Sport Management

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 366-386

  Sam, Michael P ^a   Jackson, Steven J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745595883     PISSN: 08884773     EISSN: 1543270X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jsm.20.3.366     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adie, R.F., & Thomas, P.G. (1987). The administrative state and the role of the citizen. In R.F. Adie & P.G. Thomas (Eds.), Canadian public administration: Problematic perspectives (pp. 556-603). Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice Hall.
2. Amis, J., & Burton, T.L. (1996). Beyond reason: Formulating sport policy in Canada. Avante, 2(2), 17-36.
3. Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
4. Ash, J. (2002, June 18). SPARC ignites sports powderkeg. The New Zealand Herald, p. B8.
5. Ashforth, A. (1990). Reckoning schemes of legitimation: On commissions of inquiry as power/knowledge forms. Journal of Historical Sociology, 3(1), 1-22.
6. Atkinson, M.M. (1993). Governing Canada: Institutions and public policy. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Canada.
7. Aucoin, P. (1990). Contributions of commissions of inquiry to policy analysis: An evaluation. In P.A. Pross, I. Christie, & J.A. Yogis (Eds.), Commissions of inquiry (pp. 197-208). Toronto: Carswell.
8. Brown, G. (2002, September 20). Anger at axing of community sports funding. The Daily News (New Plymouth), p. 2.
9. Burton, T.L. (1979). A review and analysis of Canadian case studies in public participation. Plan Canada, 19(1), 13-22.
10. Canadian Heritage. (2001). Towards a Canadian sport policy: A discussion paper. Hull, Quebec: Author.
11. Cantelon, H. (2003). Canadian sport and politics. In J. Crossman (Ed.), Canadian sport sociology (pp. 172-189). Scarborough, Ontario: Thomson Nelson.
12. Chalip, L. (1991). Sport and the state: The case of the United States of America. In F. Landry, M. Landry, & M. Yerles (Eds.), Sport... the third millennium (pp. 243-250). Sainte-Foy, Quebec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
13. Chalip, L. (1995). Policy analysis in sport management. Journal of Sport Management, 9, 1-13.
14. Chalip, L. (1996). Critical policy analysis: The illustrative case of New Zealand sport policy development. Journal of Sport Management, 10, 310-324.
15. Checkoway, B. (1981). The politics of public hearings. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 566-582.
16. Christie, L., & Pross, A.P. (1990). Introduction. In A.P. Pross, I. Christie, & J.A. Yogis (Eds.), Commissions of inquiry (pp. 1-20). Toronto: Carswell Publications.
17. Coderre, D. (2000). Speaking notes for the Honourable Denis Coderre Secretary of States (amateur sport) on the occasion of the first sport conference. Fredericton, New Brunswick.
18. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1989). Research methods in education (3rd ed.). London: Croom Helm.
19. Collins, C., & Downey, J. (2000). Politics, government and sport. In C. Collins (Ed.), Sport in New Zealand society (pp. 201-221). Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press Ltd.
20. Collins, C., & Stuart, M. (1994). Politics and sport in New Zealand. In L.D. Trenberth & C.W. Collins (Eds.), Sport management in New Zealand: An introduction (pp. 43-58). Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press.
21. Considine, M. (1994). Public policy: A critical approach. Melbourne, Victoria: Macmillan Education Australia.
22. Dahl, R.A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1991). Introduction. In W.W. Powell & P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Dingwall, R. (1997). Accounts, interviews and observations. In G. Miller & R. Dingwall (Eds.), Context and method in qualitative research (pp. 51-65). London: Sage Publications.
25. Doern, G.B., & Phidd, R.W. (1992). Canadian public policy: Ideas, structure, process (2nd ed.). Scarborough, Ontario: Nelson Canada.
26. Fielding, J. (1993). Qualitative interviewing. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life. London: Sage.
27. Fischer, F. (1993). Policy discourse and the politics of Washington think tanks. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 21-42). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28. Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361-376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Forester, J. (1993). Critical theory, public policy, and planning practice: Toward a critical pragmatism. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
30. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
31. Goetz, J.P., & LeCompte, M.D. (1981). Ethnographic research and the problem of data reduction. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 12, 51-70.
32. Hall, P.A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
33. Hall, P.A., & Taylor, R.C.R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936-957.
34. Harvey, J. (2002). Sport and citizenship policy: A shift toward a new normative framework for evaluating sport policy in Canada? Isuma, the Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 3(1), 160-165.
35. Harvey, J., Beamish, R., & Defrance, J. (1993). Physical exercise policy and the welfare state: A framework for comparative analysis. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 28(1), 53-62.
36. Henry, I.P. (1990). Sport and the state: The development of sport policy in post-war Britain. In F. Kew (Ed.), Social scientific perspectives on sport (pp. 42-49). Leeds, UK: British Association of Sport Sciences, National Coaching Foundation.
37. Houlihan, B. (1997). Sport, policy, and politics: A comparative analysis. New York: Routledge.
38. Houlihan, B., & White, A. (2002). Politics of sports development: Development of sport or development through sport? London: Routledge.
39. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
40. Jones, A. (2002). Groups left in limbo as SPARC axes fund. Retrieved July 16, 2002, from www.odt.co.nz.
41. Kernaghan, K., & Siegel, D. (1995). Public administration in Canada (3rd ed.). Toronto.
42. Kidd, B. (1988). The philosophy of excellence: Olympic performances, class power, and the Canadian state. In P.J. Galasso (Ed.), Philosophy of sport and physical activity: Issues and concepts (pp. 11-31). Toronto: Canadian Scholar's Press.
43. Kikulis, L.M. (2000). Continuity and change in governance and decision making in national sport organizations: Institutional explanations. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 293-320.
44. Levin, P. (1997). Making social policy: The mechanisms of government and politics, and how to investigate them. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
45. MacAloon, J.J. (1990). Steroids and the state: Dubin, melodrama and the accomplishment of innocence. Public Culture, 2(2), 41-64.
46. Macdonald, C. (1999). Sport and the welfare state's "social laboratory". Paper presented at the 6th Congress of the International Society of the History of Physical Education and Sport, Budapest.
47. Mallard, T. (2000, June 29). Major review into sport, fitness and leisure, Press Release: New Zealand Government Executive.
48. March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
49. Maykut, P.S., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. Washington, D.C.: Falmer Press.
50. McKay, J. (1997). Managing gender: Affirmative action and organizational power in Australian, Canadian, and New Zealand sport. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
51. Meikle, H. (2002, June 27). SPARC's seven-sport strategy: Soccer and hockey fear loss of grassroots support. Retrieved July 7, 2002, from www.odt.co.nz.
52. Ministerial Taskforce. (2001). Getting set for an active nation: Report of the sport, fitness and leisure ministerial taskforce. Wellington: Author.
53. Minogue, M. (1993). Theory and practice in public policy and administration. In M. Hill (Ed.), The policy process: A reader (pp. 10-33). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
54. Newell, S., & Swan, J. (1995). The diffusion of innovations in sport organizations: An evaluative framework. Journal of Sport Management, 9, 317-337.
55. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
56. Palmer, F.R. (2000). Maori girls, power, physical education, sport, and play: Being hungus, hori, and hoha. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Otago, Dunedin.
57. Parsons, D.W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.
58. Peters, B.G. (1996). Political institutions, old and new. In R.E. Goodin & H. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp. 205-220). Oxford, UK: Oxford Unversity Press.
59. Reich, S. (2000). The four faces of institutionalism: Public policy and a pluralistic perspective. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13, 501-522.
60. Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis (pp. 145-185). London: Duke University Press.
61. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1995). The institutional approach. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science. London: Macmillan Press.
62. Romanos, J. (1995, June 10). Too many sport funders? Listener, 30.
63. Rothstein, B. (1996). Political institutions: An overview. In R.E. Goodin & H. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp. 133-166). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64. Rütten, A. (1993). Policy analysis and the utilization process: The interplay between sport policy and applied sociology of sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 28, 331-349.
65. Salter, L. (1990). The two contradictions in public inquiries. In P.A. Pross, I. Christie, & J.A. Yogis (Eds.), Commissions of inquiry (pp. 173-196). Toronto: Carswell.
66. Sam, M.P. (2003). What's the big idea? Reading the rhetoric of a national sport policy process. Sociology of Sport Journal, 20, 189-213.
67. Sam, M.P. (2005). The makers of sport policy: A task(force) to be reckoned with. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21, 78-99.
68. Sam, M.P., & Jackson, S.J. (2004). Sport policy development in New Zealand: Paradoxes of an integrative paradigm. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 39, 205-222.
69. Schmitter, P.C. (1990). Democratic theory and neocorporatist practice. In R.C. Macridis & B.E. Brown (Eds.), Comparative politics: Notes and readings (7th ed., pp. 266-274). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
70. Sports Development Inquiry Committee. (1985). Sport on the move: Report to the Minister of Recreation and Sport. Wellington: Government Print.
71. Sproule-Jones, M. (1993). Governments at work: Canadian parliamentary federalism and its public policy effects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
72. Stoker, G. (1995). Introduction. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 1-18). Kent: Macmillan Press.
73. Thibault, L., & Harvey, J. (1997). Fostering interorganizational linkages in the Canadian sports delivery system. Journal of Sport Management, 11, 45-68.
74. Weingast, B. R. (1996). Political institutions: Rational choice perspectives. In R.E. Goodin & H. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp. 167-190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75. Young, R.A. (1981). Reigning in James: The limits of the taskforce. Canadian Public Administration, 24, 596-611.