Linking in fluid construction grammars

Belgian/Netherlands Artificial Intelligence Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 11-18

  Steels, Luc ^a,b   De Beule, Joachim ^b   Neubauer, Nicolas ^a  

^a SONY COMPUTER SCIENCE LABORATORY   (France)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION GRAMMAR; EMBODIED AGENT; GRAMMATICAL CONSTRUCTION; LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SELF-ORGANISATION; TECHNICAL DETAILS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33745594778     PISSN: 15687805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bergen, B.K. and N.C. Chang. (2003) Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding. In J-0 Ostman and M. Fried (Eds.) Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive and Cross-Language Dimensions John Benjamin Publ Cy. Amsterdam.
2. Bryant, J. (2004) Scalable Construction-Based Parsing and Semantic Analysis. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding. Boston 2004
3. Clark, H. H., and Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In: Resnick, L.B., J.M. Levine, and S.D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington: APA Books.
4. De Beule, J. and L. Steels (2005) Hierarchy in Fluid Construction Grammar. In: Furbach, U. (eds) (2005) Proceedings of KI-2005. Lecture Notes in AI 3698. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 1-15.
5. Goldberg, A.E. 1995. Constructions.: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
6. Fried, M. and J-0 Ostman (2004) Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. Chapter 2. In: Fried, M. and J-0 Ostman (2004) Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective. John Benjamins Pub. Cy. Amsterdam, pp. 11-87.
7. Traugott, E. and Heine, B. (1991) Approaches to Grammaticalization. Volume I and II. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
8. Hopper, P. (1987) Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Conference (BLS), 13:139-157
9. Kay, P. and C. Fillmore (1999) Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: the What's X doing Y? Construction Language 75, pp. 1-33.
10. Michaelis, L. 2004. Entity and Event Coercion in a Symbolic Theory of Syntax In J.-O. Oestman and M. Fried, (eds.), Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Constructional Approaches to Language series, volume 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
11. Pollard, C. and I. Sag 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Center for the Study of Language and Information of Stanford University. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Steels, L., F. Kaplan, A Mclntyre and J. Van Looveren (2001) Crucial factors in the origins of word-meaning. In Wray, A., editor, The Transition to Language, Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK, 2002.
13. Steels, L. (2003) Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Science. Volume 7, Issue 7, July 2003, pp. 308-312.
14. Steels, L. (2004) Constructivist Development of Grounded Construction Grammars Scott, D., Daelemans, W. and Walker M. (eds) (2004) Proceedings Annual Meeting Association for Computational Linguistic Conference. Barcelona, p. 9-19.
15. Steels, L. (2005) What triggers the emergence of grammar?. AISB'05: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Communication (EELC'05), pages 143-150, Hatfield, 2005. University of Hertfordshire
16. Steels, L. (2005) The Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Structure: From Lexical to Grammatical Communication Systems. Connection Science. Vol. 17(3)
17. Talmy, L. (2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Concept Structuring Systems (Symbol, Speech, and Communication) The MIT Press, Cambridge Ma.