Imaging for Percutaneous Renal Access and Management of Renal Calculi

Urologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 353-364

  Park, Sangtae ^a   Pearle, Margaret S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FLANK PAIN; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HYDROTHORAX; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTRAVENOUS PYELOGRAPHY; KIDNEY CALCIFICATION; KIDNEY CALYX; KIDNEY SURGERY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATING ROOM; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY; PEROPERATIVE ECHOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION SAFETY; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; REVIEW; STAGHORN STONE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; URETER STONE;

HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; KIDNEY CALCULI; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 33745591085     PISSN: 00940143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2006.03.003     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Roth C.S., Bowyer B.A., and Berquist T.H. Utility of the plain abdominal radiograph for diagnosing ureteral calculi. Ann Emerg Med 14 (1985) 311
2. Mutgi A., Williams J.W., and Nettleman M. Renal colic. Utility of the plain abdominal roentgenogram. Arch Intern Med 151 (1991) 1589
3. Jackman S.V., Potter S.R., Regan F., et al. Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 164 (2000) 308
4. Boyd R., and Gray A.J. Role of the plain radiograph and urinalysis in acute ureteric colic. J Accid Emerg Med 13 (1996) 390
5. Weiss A., Price R., Sage M., and Barratt L. The intravenous pyelogram in renal colic. Australas Radiol 32 (1988) 429
6. Mutazindwa T., and Husseini T. Imaging in acute renal colic: the intravenous urogram remains the gold standard. Eur J Radiol 23 (1996) 238
7. Sheley R.C., Semonsen K.G., and Quinn S.F. Helical CT in the evaluation of renal colic. Am J Emerg Med 17 (1999) 279
8. Miller O.F., Rineer S.K., Reichard S.R., et al. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology 52 (1998) 982
9. Boulay I., Holtz P., Foley W.D., et al. Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172 (1999) 1485
10. Chen M.Y., and Zagoria R.J. Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?. J Emerg Med 17 (1999) 299
11. Memarsadeghi M., Heinz-Peer G., Helbich T.H., et al. Unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having urinary stone disease: effect of section width on diagnosis. Radiology 235 (2005) 530
12. Thiruchelvam N., Mostafid H., and Ubhayakar G. Planning percutaneous nephrolithotomy using multi-detector computed tomography urography, multi-planar reconstruction and three-dimensional reformatting. BJU Int 95 (2005) 1280
13. Leder R.A., and Nelson R.C. Three-dimensional CT of the genitourinary tract. J Endourol 15 (2001) 37
14. Buchholz N.P. Three-dimensional CT scan stone reconstruction for the planning of percutaneous surgery in a morbidly obese patient. Urol Int 65 (2000) 46
15. Heidenreich A., Desgrandschamps F., and Terrier F. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol 41 (2002) 351
16. Pfister S.A., Deckart A., Laschke S., et al. Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol 13 (2003) 2513
17. Fielding J.R., Steele G., Fox L.A., et al. Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography. J Urol 157 (1997) 2071
18. Yilmaz S., Sindel T., Arslan G., et al. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol 8 (1998) 212
19. Hubert J., Blum A., Cormier L., et al. Three-dimensional CT-scan reconstruction of renal calculi. A new tool for mapping-out staghorn calculi and follow-up of radiolucent stones. Eur Urol 31 (1997) 297
20. Raj G.V., Auge B.K., Weizer A.Z., et al. Percutaneous management of calculi within horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 170 (2003) 48
21. Ghani K.R., Rintoul M., Patel U., et al. Three-dimensional planning of percutaneous renal stone surgery in a horseshoe kidney using 16-slice CT and volume-rendered movies. J Endourol 19 (2005) 461
22. Skoog S.J., Reed M.D., Gaudier Jr. F.A., et al. The posterolateral and the retrorenal colon: implication in percutaneous stone extraction. J Urol 134 (1985) 110
23. Vallancien G., Capdeville R., Veillon B., et al. Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 134 (1985) 1185
24. Hopper K.D., and Yakes W.F. The posterior intercostal approach for percutaneous renal procedures: risk of puncturing the lung, spleen, and liver as determined by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154 (1990) 115
25. Young A.T., Hunter D.W., Castaneda-Zuniga W.R., et al. Percutaneous extraction of urinary calculi: use of the intercostal approach. Radiology 154 (1985) 633
26. Golijanin D., Katz R., Verstandig A., et al. The supracostal percutaneous nephrostomy for treatment of staghorn and complex kidney stones. J Endourol 12 (1998) 403
27. Stening S.G., and Bourne S. Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi. J Endourol 12 (1998) 359
28. Kekre N.S., Gopalakrishnan G.G., Gupta G.G., et al. Supracostal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: experience with 102 cases. J Endourol 15 (2001) 789
29. Aron M., Goel R., Kesarwani P.K., et al. Upper pole access for complex lower pole renal calculi. BJU Int 94 (2004) 849
30. Munver R., Delvecchio F.C., Newman G.E., et al. Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 166 (2001) 1242
31. Picus D., Weyman P.J., Clayman R.V., et al. Intercostal space nephrostomy for percutaneous stone removal. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147 (1986) 393
32. Forsyth M.J., and Fuchs E.F. The supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 137 (1987) 197
33. Sengupta S., Donnellan S., Vincent J.M., et al. CT analysis of caliceal anatomy in the supine and prone positions. J Endourol 14 (2000) 555
34. Ng C.S., Herts B.R., and Streem S.B. Percutaneous access to upper pole renal stones: role of prone 3-dimensional computerized tomography in inspiratory and expiratory phases. J Urol 173 (2005) 124
35. Maheshwari P.N., Chopade D.K., and Andankar M.G. Comment on "supracostal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: experience of 102 cases". J Endourol 17 (2003) 529
36. Heyns C.F., and van Gelderen W.F. 3-dimensional imaging of the pelviocaliceal system by computerized tomographic reconstruction. J Urol 144 (1990) 1335
37. Liberman S.N., Halpern E.J., Sullivan K., et al. Spiral computed tomography for staghorn calculi. Urology 50 (1997) 519
38. Matlaga B.R., Shah O.D., Zagoria R.J., et al. Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 170 (2003) 45
39. Evans H.J., and Wollin T.A. The management of urinary calculi in pregnancy. Curr Opin Urol 11 (2001) 379
40. McAleer S.J., and Loughlin K.R. Nephrolithiasis and pregnancy. Curr Opin Urol 14 (2004) 123
41. Kavoussi L.R., Albala D.M., Basler J.W., et al. Percutaneous management of urolithiasis during pregnancy. J Urol 148 (1992) 1069
42. Fabrizio M.D., Gray D.S., Feld R.I., et al. Placement of ureteral stents in pregnancy using ultrasound guidance. Tech Urol 2 (1996) 121
43. Francesca F., Felipetto R., Mosca F., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of transplanted kidney. J Endourol 16 (2002) 225
44. Lu H.F., Shekarriz B., and Stoller M.L. Donor-gifted allograft urolithiasis: early percutaneous management. Urology 59 (2002) 25
45. Sakurai H., Mitsuhashi N., Harashima K., et al. CT-fluoroscopy guided interstitial brachytherapy with image-based treatment planning for unresectable locally recurrent rectal carcinoma. Brachytherapy 3 (2004) 222
46. Froelich J.J., and Wagner H.J. CT-fluoroscopy: tool or gimmick?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24 (2001) 297
47. Ogan K., Corwin T.S., Smith T., et al. Sensitivity of chest fluoroscopy compared with chest CT and chest radiography for diagnosing hydropneumothorax in association with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urology 62 (2003) 988
48. Hellawell G.O., Mutch S.J., Thevendran G., et al. Radiation exposure and the urologist: what are the risks?. J Urol 174 (2005) 948
49. Yang R.M., Morgan T., and Bellman G.C. Radiation protection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a new urologic surgery radiation shield. J Endourol 16 (2002) 727
50. Norris T.G. Radiation safety in fluoroscopy. Radiol Technol 73 (2002) 511
51. Denstedt J.D., Clayman R.V., and Picus D.D. Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. J Urol 145 (1991) 703
52. Pearle M.S., Watamull L.M., and Mullican M.A. Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 162 (1999) 23
53. Waldmann T.B., Lashley D.B., and Fuchs E.F. Unenhanced computerized axial tomography to detect retained calculi after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy. J Urol 162 (1999) 312
54. Narepalem N., Sundaram C.P., Boridy I.C., et al. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size. J Urol 167 (2002) 1235
55. Van Appledorn S., Ball A.J., Patel V.R., et al. Limitations of noncontrast CT for measuring ureteral stones. J Endourol 17 (2003) 851
56. Kampa R.J., Ghani K.R., Wahed S., et al. Size Matters: A Survey of How Urinary-Tract Stones are Measured in the UK. J Endourol 19 (2005) 856